Ukip expels councillor Rozanne Duncan for 'jaw-dropping' comments in TV interview.

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by Russ

Has anyone suggested she's used racist language? A good Ukipper has a pop at gays too don't forget.

that quote came from martyh not me

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by Russ

Has anyone suggested she's used racist language? A good Ukipper has a pop at gays too don't forget.

I think you'll find " poofter". Seems to be nationally acceptable term........according to another thread.

Originally Posted by Pierre

I don't know, I don't know what she said.

It's a fact she made comments.

How "jaw dropping" they may be is a matter of personal opinion.



I don't think it is, and I'd like to know what she said.

Either way I'd like to know.

It's a fact she made racist comments as decided by UKIP leaders.

Wanting to know what they where so you can make a judgement only means you believe in a sliding scale of racism.

[Pierre]

Indeed, I'd like to know what they were

---------- Post added at 12:09 ---------- Previous post was at 12:08 ----------

Is it " bongo bongo land" or " n****r".?


There's a big difference, in my opinion.

Originally Posted by papa smurf

that quote came from martyh not me

ERR no it did not ,all the links provided from the OP say she made highly racist comments ,try reading things properly

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by martyh

So do you think UKIP was right to expell her based on the fact she made jaw dropping racist comments .As far as i can see what she said is irrelavent,she made the comments (whatever they where) and UKIP decided they where that bad it justified immediate expulsion .The only judgement to be made in this thread is whether UKIP are right to expell members they deem to have used racist language

its defiantly one of yours martyh

[Mr Angry]

Some of the bleeding heart, meusli munching, sandal wearing, leftie liberals seeking confirmation of the grounds on which Ms Duncan was expelled with immediate effect (allegedly in keeping with "rule 15 of the UKIP Constitution") may be interested to know there is no "Rule 15" in the current UKIP constitution.

Now there's a surprise.

[papa smurf]

so she has 28 days to appeal against a none existent rule that has never been in the ukip constitution - perhaps the reporting of this was a little incorrect or maybe ukip are down the pub rushing through a new rule as we speak , i now wonder if there is an interview the one fact i can corroborate is the BBC exists

maybe she took a few days off for the xmas pantomime .

Originally Posted by Pierre

I'm not giving her the benefit of the doubt as such, I reserving comment until I know what she said, that's all.

---------- Post added at 11:55 ---------- Previous post was at 11:49 ----------



I don't know, I don't know what she said.

It's a fact she made comments.

How "jaw dropping" they may be is a matter of personal opinion.



I don't think it is, and I'd like to know what she said.

Either way I'd like to know.

So will you be reserving comment in other cases when you don't know the full facts?

---------- Post added at 13:06 ---------- Previous post was at 13:05 ----------

Originally Posted by Pierre

I think you'll find " poofter". Seems to be nationally acceptable term........according to another thread.

Not according to the survey quoted in that thread - 60% said they personally found it offensive.

---------- Post added at 13:09 ---------- Previous post was at 13:06 ----------

Originally Posted by papa smurf

so she has 28 days to appeal against a none existent rule that has never been in the ukip constitution - perhaps the reporting of this was a little incorrect or maybe ukip are down the pub rushing through a new rule as we speak , i now wonder if there is an interview the one fact i can corroborate is the BBC exists

maybe she took a few days off for the xmas pantomime .

I am surprised she didn't "resign by mutual consent" - the last two did....

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by Hugh

So will you be reserving comment in other cases when you don't know the full facts?

---------- Post added at 13:06 ---------- Previous post was at 13:05 ----------

Not according to the survey quoted in that thread - 60% said they found it personally offensive.

40 ish % said it wasn't then
and did you know the TARDIS is smaller on the outside

did you know the TARDIS isn't real

btw, only 27% said it wasn't.....

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by Hugh

did you know the TARDIS isn't real

btw, only 27% said it wasn't.....

thaks thats ruined xmas day

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by Hugh

So will you be reserving comment in other cases when you don't know the full facts?

I may, I may not. That I believe is my perogative.

Not according to the survey quoted in that thread - 60% said they personally found it offensive.

It was a glib comment, I wasn't expecting captain fact checker to either confirm or deny its accuracy.

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by Pierre

I may, I may not. That I believe is my perogative.




It was a glib comment, I wasn't expecting captain fact checker to either confirm or deny its accuracy.

oh come on its the only fact in the entire thread

Originally Posted by papa smurf

[/COLOR]

its defiantly one of yours martyh

now run along and read what Russ wrote to which you replied "that quote came from martyh not me".

It's the BBC and UKIP that have said she racist language