U.S President: Donald Trump

[pip08456]

This could prove interesting if true.

Originally Posted by Osem

Can you imagine the furore if that'd been Trump? Teflon clearly isn't only Blair's friend.

Trump has had numerous affairs already hasn't he? It's just the standard of what to expect from a President seems to have dropped with Trump.

Originally Posted by pip08456

This could prove interesting if true.

Almost certainly isn't true.

[Osem]

Originally Posted by Damien

Trump has had numerous affairs already hasn't he? It's just the standard of what to expect from a President seems to have dropped with Trump.

Really? Whilst in office? I think it dropped with Clinton and before him several others including Nixon and Kennedy who was a serial womaniser whilst in office. Clinton got away with his lies and deeds whilst in office whilst Nixon didn't and was forced to resign. I doubt very much whether Trump would get away with the sort of stuff they engaged in but maybe time will tell.

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by pip08456

This could prove interesting if true.

lol! Not this nonsensical source again. We advised you previously that this site is half-baked when you posted the link to the story about Carter Page going to Moscow with tapes of Donald Trump on him.

[ianch99]

Watch this (forward to 2:00 if you want to skip the preamble):

Constituent loses his temper at Rep. Tom MacArthur over health care

This man delivers a passionate but cogent take down of Trump's ACA repeal bill.

[ianch99]

Donald, the gift that keeps giving:

Trump Revealed Highly Classified Intelligence to Russia, in Break With Ally, Officials Say

All the President's strawmen defend Trump's Oval Office blunder with Russians

Won't be long before we hear "Donald, you're fired" ..

A President has authority to declassify information. No crime has been committed much to the disappointment to the Democrats and leftie snowflakes. But his U.S Secretary of State says he did not reveal stuff and his Security Advisor also said same. Nothing to see here, another FAKE NEWS event from an Anti-Trump source.

Originally Posted by Mick

A President has authority to declassify information. No crime has been committed much to the disappointment to the Democrats and leftie snowflakes. But his U.S Secretary of State says he did not reveal stuff and his Security Advisor also said same. Nothing to see here, another FAKE NEWS event from an Anti-Trump source.

No one is saying it's illegal, just irresponsible. Also it's not a surprise his government are saying it's fine is it?

If this were Clinton would you also think nothing bad was done?

That's if it happened, you have two of his high ranking cabinet members saying what some story being reported in Washington post, is false. They were right there and they totally refute the wild claims in the WP. Not first time they published fake news.

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Damien

No one is saying it's illegal, just irresponsible. Also it's not a surprise his government are saying it's fine is it?

If this were Clinton would you also think nothing bad was done?

Do you think the Washington Post has made this up? It's a serious allegation to make up, even if as you say it's technically not illegal for the US President to have done such a thing.

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

Do you think the Washington Post has made this up? It's a serious allegation to make up, even if as you say it's technically not illegal for the US President to have done such a thing.

The question is, HTF does the Washington Post know what was said? For them to apparently know, someone else must have been in room, cannot see those already there, blabbing as they would be in breach of some Confidentiality clause.

The NYT and WP need to get a bloody grip or just fold, their precious crooked Hillary lost and they need to stop reporting any false narrative they choose.

Trump was saying he may abandon Daily Press briefings and just issue one Statement on current events, I don't blame him if he did that some of those journalists act like rats.

In other news, if it's true, I read somewhere the Clinton email Investigation maybe reopened in the aftermath of Comey being fired by Trump.

[Mr K]

The sun rose today apparently, don't believe it, it's definitely fake news.....

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Mick

The question is, HTF does the Washington Post know what was said? For them to apparently know, someone else must have been in room, cannot see those already there, blabbing as they would be in breach of some Confidentiality clause.

There's surely only a few options on this intriguing story:

1) The Washinton Post have invented the story.
Likelihood: Low, it would cause severe reputational damage to the paper.

2) Someone has misled the paper.
Likelihood: Possible, but the paper would have due diligence processes in place to reduce the possibility of this happening and the story is still online.

3) Someone present has informed the paper in confidence.
Likelihood: High if more than a couple of people were there. The story is still on the paper's website a day after it was first published.

Originally Posted by Mr K

The sun rose today apparently, don't believe it, it's definitely fake news.....

I do not believe it. It's definitely fake news, it's absolutely raining cats and dogs here, did so yesterday also, all day. No sun seen.

---------- Post added at 12:50 ---------- Previous post was at 12:45 ----------

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

There's surely only a few options on this intriguing story:

1) The Washinton Post have invented the story.
Likelihood: Low, it would cause severe reputational damage to the paper.

2) Someone has misled the paper.
Likelihood: Possible, but the paper would have due diligence processes in place to reduce the possibility of this happening and the story is still online.

3) Someone present has informed the paper in confidence.
Likelihood: High if more than a couple of people were there. The story is still on the paper's website a day after it was first published.

The likelihood of someone present blabbing is not high at all. Very few people would have been there, if someone blabbed they would easily be worked out who and fired from their job.

---------- Post added at 13:12 ---------- Previous post was at 12:50 ----------

Trump Latest:

Donald J. Trump‏ @realDonaldTrump 1 hour ago
As President I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining....

Donald J. Trump‏ @realDonaldTrump 52 minutes ago
...to terrorism and airline flight safety. Humanitarian reasons, plus I want Russia to greatly step up their fight against ISIS & terrorism.

So he is admitting he shared some information, not necessarily classified information, but information that he says Russia should know, in their joint effort to trash ISIS and he has the Authority to do so as President. I do not see it as irresponsible, I just see jumped up leftie news agencies, looking for another avenue to have a go. Russia and the US being friends is good for the World. With Hillary as President, it would have been nuclear war for sure and we would not have come out of it well, being right in the middle of it.

[passingbat]

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

Do you think the Washington Post has made this up? It's a serious allegation to make up, even if as you say it's technically not illegal for the US President to have done such a thing.

I don't know whether the story in the Washington Post is right or wrong. But how can you trust a Newspaper that David Rockefeller specifically listed among the News outlets colluding with the Bilderberg group to hide their globalist, anti nation state agenda?