Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
25-06-2011, 21:03
|
#1
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: London
Services: VIP, going to the dark side with BT/SKY (20th Aug)
Posts: 23
|
Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
looked on the internet and I can see a lot of bad reviews on the scientific atlantic v+ box and how much better the Samsung box is. I have had the SA box for 3 years and not had any issues, sure it can be at times be a tad slow in changing channels but not so bad that it becomes a problem and the HD picture is pretty good to me.
|
|
|
25-06-2011, 21:11
|
#2
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,386
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
If you have a good one then keep hold of it. It's has a dated look it's got a noisy hard drive, slowness especially at midnight. It's sd picture is phenomenal though, wipes the floor with my tivo
|
|
|
25-06-2011, 21:18
|
#3
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: London
Services: VIP, going to the dark side with BT/SKY (20th Aug)
Posts: 23
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jb66
If you have a good one then keep hold of it. It's it's dated look it's noisy hard drive, slowness especially at midnight. It's sd picture is phenomenal though, wipes the floor with my tivo
|
Yeah agree that the SD picture is excellent, especially against what I have seen from the SKY SD picture. Not seen the SD on a Tivo yet.
|
|
|
25-06-2011, 21:40
|
#4
|
Guest
Location: Luton
Services: Big Kahuna, Phone XL, Boxnation
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mollda
Yeah agree that the SD picture is excellent, especially against what I have seen from the SKY SD picture. Not seen the SD on a Tivo yet.
|
Until there has been the software update to TiVo to fix SD picture for some TV, it cannot be judged fairly against any STB!
|
|
|
26-06-2011, 09:53
|
#5
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 46
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
i have the SA V+ box , had it for nearly a year now, am very happy with it, not had any issues at all
|
|
|
26-06-2011, 10:03
|
#6
|
cf.geek
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Warrington
Services: | Freeview | VirginTV XL with TiVo | BB L | Phone M |
Posts: 564
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
I had an SA V+ and it was very noisy; at first I had it on a wooden TV stand and it sounded like someone was constantly drilling.
When I moved to a glass stand it was better, but you noticed it was much quieter in the room when you turned it off (even when the TV was on).
The channel changing speed I could live with, but when you pressed i and could actually watch it slowly draw a black background, followed by a grey outline then add the text that was painful.
Then it developed problems; it would randomly reboot, usually when recording something.
That, the fact it looked like something the 80s wanted back, and the measly 20+ hours or HD space meant I jumped to TiVo straight away - mainly for the extra hard drive space.
|
|
|
26-06-2011, 11:54
|
#7
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,403
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlayzell
Until there has been the software update to TiVo to fix SD picture for some TV, it cannot be judged fairly against any STB!
|
VM are planning a software update to improve SD picture quality on TiVo?
|
|
|
26-06-2011, 13:08
|
#8
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Fleet, Hampshire
Age: 52
Services: VIP50, TiVo
Posts: 2,869
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
VM are planning a software update to improve SD picture quality on TiVo?
|
Yes.
http://community.virginmedia.com/t5/...ty/td-p/500443
|
|
|
26-06-2011, 13:19
|
#9
|
Guest
Location: Essex
Services: vm broadband tvxl TiVo, v+ sky sports and phone.
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jb66
If you have a good one then keep hold of it. It's has a dated look it's got a noisy hard drive, slowness especially at midnight. It's sd picture is phenomenal though, wipes the floor with my tivo
|
I have a S/A V+ box funnily enough i do not find the hard drive paticularly noisy,but yes it does slow down at midnight alright.!
But am very impressed with the sd picture quality so much so when i took HD on sky sports for a while i did not thenk it worth the extra cash,as the V+ picture on sd is so good.I plan to hang to my one for the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
26-06-2011, 13:22
|
#10
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nottingham NG6 (ex-NTL Langley)
Services: Tivo; XL TV; L Broadband; M Phone
Posts: 285
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
Three things I don't miss about the SA V+
(1) The midnight/1am slowdown (avoid using FWD/REW, try to watch programmes with no advert breaks !)
(2) Having to nurse it through HD recordings - only being able to record one HD channel at a time, not being able to watch another HD channel whilst it was recording an HD channel or face the wrath of the random reboot
(3) Unreliable CatchUp - sometimes it would work, sometimes it wouldn't, usually within a few seconds of selecting the same programme
Other than that, and some slowness, generally the SA V+ was a good machine - yes the SD picture was marginally better than Tivo, but not a deal breaker in my opinion.
|
|
|
27-06-2011, 11:03
|
#11
|
cf.geek
Join Date: Apr 2008
Services: V6 with Full-House/Maxit Sports & Movies, 100Mb broadband, Talk Weekends.
Posts: 570
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
The midnight slowdown is one big bug, and that'll never be fixed - but by itself I can live with this.
The only real "irritant" are the 4 dud recordings I have to delete every morning and have done for the past few years. I know I could easily reformat but for the hassle of wiping or having to dump all the other recordings, that's always felt a little extreme. If the UK4 software update clears this longstanding bug, then I call that a result :-)
When publicity for the TiVo first came out a few months ago I was rather tempted. But to be honest, I've rather gone off it.
|
|
|
27-06-2011, 12:26
|
#12
|
Inactive
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 64
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
Before Tivo I had the TVDrive silver version.
Never had a problem with it in all those years.
I was sad to see it go, but the rotters wouldn't let me keep it.
|
|
|
27-06-2011, 21:30
|
#13
|
Needs more upload
Join Date: Mar 2009
Services: TiVo V6, TiVo 500GB, Samsung V Box, Full House TV + Sky Sports SD, VIVID 200, Talk Weekends Phone
Posts: 162
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
I have one dud recording on my SA V+ that occurred when it tried to record the same program twice at the same time due to a bug with the EPG data at the time. I've just left it there - no point in deleting it for it to re-appear.
I don't use the box for HD and only have had minor issues with it. I'll reformat it should it ever be empty!
|
|
|
28-06-2011, 12:22
|
#14
|
cf.member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 81
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
Other than the midnight slowdown I never had a problem with my old silver SA TV Drive until the hard disk gave up the ghost six weeks ago. Now on my 2nd replacement Samsung, which admittedly doesn't suffer from the slowdown problem. But as the first one only lasted 3 weeks, I do wonder about Samsung V+ reliability.
|
|
|
28-06-2011, 19:35
|
#15
|
Guest
Location: Luton
Services: Big Kahuna, Phone XL, Boxnation
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Is the SA V+ box really that bad?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Star
Other than the midnight slowdown I never had a problem with my old silver SA TV Drive until the hard disk gave up the ghost six weeks ago. Now on my 2nd replacement Samsung, which admittedly doesn't suffer from the slowdown problem. But as the first one only lasted 3 weeks, I do wonder about Samsung V+ reliability.
|
Had my Samsung over a year now very reliable ( touch wood) My first V+ box!
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:03.
|