UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
01-02-2006, 11:30
|
#46
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Up here
Posts: 36,520
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Quote:
Originally Posted by STOP
Why can't NTL do anything then perhaps you should work for them you know so much about the subject
|
Dezzo used to work for ntl until recently.
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 11:30
|
#47
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Quote:
Originally Posted by STOP
So if the police knocked we'd just have to hope they believe us and dont suggest we have another computer connected which they never found. If I was a policeman I wouldn't go for the excuse that it must be cloned or something after all. Ltes hope you and Chris haven't been clone
|
Why are you arguing this point? It's a pointless hypothetical situation and in the highly unlikely event that it does happen the Police STILL need to prove (as Chris T pointed out) that you actually have the materials they're accusing you of downloading. They search your PC, they don't find it .. the problems gone away.
(and no-one is going to clone my modem as I'm not an NTL customer)
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 11:32
|
#48
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 36,934
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Quote:
Originally Posted by STOP
So if the police knocked we'd just have to hope they believe us and dont suggest we have another computer connected which they never found. If I was a policeman I wouldn't go for the excuse that it must be cloned or something after all. Ltes hope you and Chris haven't been clone
|
Well, I'm not on NTL cable so it's less of a problem for me. And my wireless network is secure. However, don't forget, at the end of the day you don't have to convince the police, you have to convince a jury.
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 11:34
|
#49
|
Guest
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bifta
Why are you arguing this point? It's a pointless hypothetical situation and in the highly unlikely event that it does happen the Police STILL need to prove (as Chris T pointed out) that you actually have the materials they're accusing you of downloading. They search your PC, they don't find it .. the problems gone away.
(and no-one is going to clone my modem as I'm not an NTL customer)
|
I'm not arguing more worried I know how the police can be from personal experience. Luckily the next door neighbour was a high ranking officer who reprimanded the constable involved (enough info)
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 11:36
|
#50
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Quote:
Originally Posted by STOP
I'm not arguing more worried I know how the police can be from personal experience. Luckily the next door neighbour was a high ranking officer who reprimanded the constable involved (enough info)
|
If you haven't broken the law, you've nothing to fear. I'd suggest that you probably start another thread regarding your beef with the cops because it's not really anything to do with this thread.
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 11:41
|
#51
|
Guest
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bifta
If you haven't broken the law, you've nothing to fear. I'd suggest that you probably start another thread regarding your beef with the cops because it's not really anything to do with this thread.
|
If is when you can have three warrants for your arrest issued by a currupt copper
---------- Post added at 11:41 ---------- Previous post was at 11:39 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ D
Dezzo used to work for ntl until recently.
|
Oh right sorry still like I said if they knew everything these clones would be under control. Was he made redundant ? had that myself a few years back shame we can't all be funded by some licence fee
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 11:56
|
#52
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Glasgow
Services: SkyHD and Broadband
Posts: 9,159
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Quote:
Originally Posted by STOP
Oh right sorry still like I said if they knew everything these clones would be under control.
|
Funnily enough quite a few modem cloners were shut out recently as Ntl are trying to control the problem. Whether spending huge amounts of money on a relatively small problem is good value or not is probably why more hasn't been done.
Quote:
Originally Posted by STOP
Was he made redundant ? had that myself a few years back shame we can't all be funded by some licence fee
|
http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/ne..._the_city.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manchester News
But Mr Thompson is also poised to announce job cuts. Latest estimates are that some 6,000 of the BBC's 28,000 staff may be axed. He will open up the BBC to more independent producers and possibly cut programme budgets.
|
Just like the several thousand BBC workers eh? So much for a bottomless pot of money.
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 11:56
|
#53
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 127.0.0.1
Age: 59
Posts: 15,868
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stop
Oh right sorry still like I said if they knew everything these clones would be under control. Was he made redundant ? had that myself a few years back shame we can't all be funded by some licence fee
|
I fail to understand what relevance the above posting regarding the licence fee has to this thread. Do not drag it off topic. Such further posts in this or any other thread will be deleted and accounts suspended.
Nb do not be tempted to debate this moderator posting .
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 12:04
|
#54
|
Guest
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Quote:
Originally Posted by dezzo
Just like the several thousand BBC workers eh? So much for a bottomless pot of money.
|
dont forget the £500 million its costing to move
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob C
I fail to understand what relevance the above posting regarding the licence fee has to this thread. Do not drag it off topic. Such further posts in this or any other thread will be deleted and accounts suspended.
Nb do not be tempted to debate this moderator posting .
|
No course not but I would like to point out I wasn't the one that first went off topic. I think the security worries are relevant to this problem
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 12:46
|
#55
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,820
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Quote:
Originally Posted by STOP
I'm not arguing more worried I know how the police can be from personal experience. Luckily the next door neighbour was a high ranking officer who reprimanded the constable involved (enough info)
|
This has nothing to do with the police at all. It is a private body that is making applications to the courts to override the privacy that people who don't break the rules are entitled to.
If and when the police get involved, it will only be to ensure that the warrants issued by the court are carried out with no breach of the peace.
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 21:22
|
#56
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Services: ntl 1meg cable modem Skysports & Movies, Film4 and phone
Posts: 686
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
so who, "If I may have the temerity to ask over an ntl cable modem connection am I sharing my music with when I select the 'share music' option in ipod options in Itunes?
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 21:40
|
#57
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eglinton, Co. Derry
Posts: 7,640
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Quote:
Originally Posted by driver_problems
so who, "If I may have the temerity to ask over an ntl cable modem connection am I sharing my music with when I select the 'share music' option in ipod options in Itunes?
|
You're not actually GIVING them the files, you're only allowing Itunes on a maximum of 5 authorised machines to listen to the files in your copy of Itunes, if you turn your machine off, they can't listen to them.
|
|
|
01-02-2006, 22:57
|
#58
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dorset
Posts: 399
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
well now that FAST have won this court action
im wondering when other industrys will look for a court order to get name and addresses
dont think they will be hard to get now they have this court case as a example
if they do start getting good results from these court cases
i think the internet will become alot quieter place
|
|
|
02-02-2006, 00:57
|
#59
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,820
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smilie
well now that FAST have won this court action
im wondering when other industrys will look for a court order to get name and addresses
dont think they will be hard to get now they have this court case as a example
|
Of course they will, and if you'd had your copyright broken, the chances are so would you.
Movie companies, TV companies, artists, designers, radio stations - anywhere you find someones conceptual products being infringed in fact.
|
|
|
02-02-2006, 21:18
|
#60
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Manchester/Ex-C&W
Age: 36
Services: 50Mbit
Posts: 340
|
Re: UK court to unmask 150 'file-sharers'
Well the data protection act is pretty useless, anyone with enough corporate muscle can shuftie the information they need to bring actions.
I mean dont get me started on all the BS that happened in America with the RIAA and its subpoenas for downloading. The amount of innocents that were affected wasnt something to be proud of.
Cant an appeal be launched to the European Courts? Its quite clear that the BPI and other corporate henchmen will be looking to use this now to bully people.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:24.
|