Home News Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | BT's superfast broadband network 'risks being empty'

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Alternatives to Virgin Media > Other ISPs Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

BT's superfast broadband network 'risks being empty'
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-06-2012, 11:19   #16
Tim Deegan
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Services: 3 phone lines, 100mb broadband, and TV x2 (including one Tivo)
Posts: 2,128
Tim Deegan has reached the bronze age
Tim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze age
Re: BT's superfast broadband network 'risks being empty'

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwikbreaks View Post
Did the aluminium cable cause any problems with voice? That's all there was when it was used and it was a lot cheaper than copper. I don't think you can blame BT (or was it Post Office Telephones then) for not having a crystal ball or examining goats entrails.
Yes it did cause problems with voice. And no it wasn't Post Office Telephones then, because some of the companies who now make up Virgin also used them.

Yes it was cheaper than copper, which is why they used it. But it doesn't take much technical knowledge combined with common sense to realise that aluminium cable will start to oxidise over time. And an oxidised surface on aluminium doesn't conduct. Believe me, I spent 18 years in electroplating. So I do know about oxidisation and what conducts.
Tim Deegan is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 02-06-2012, 11:26   #17
kwikbreaks
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: May 2010
Services: Plusnet FTTC, FoxSat HDR for TV, Vonage VOIP.
Posts: 2,082
kwikbreaks has reached the bronze age
kwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze age
Re: BT's superfast broadband network 'risks being empty'

Copper oxide doesn't conduct either.

The only place oxidation would matter would be at the joints and they need keeping dry for both. Oxidation on the outside of the cable at voice frequencies wouldn't make any difference unless it was virtually all eaten away. Come to that I doubt it would matter at ADSL/VDSL frequencies either as all TV aerials are made from aluminium and they last for donkeys years totally exposed to the elements. ISTR reading that the main problem with aluminium for ADSL is the extra attenuation over copper.
kwikbreaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 11:46   #18
Tim Deegan
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Services: 3 phone lines, 100mb broadband, and TV x2 (including one Tivo)
Posts: 2,128
Tim Deegan has reached the bronze age
Tim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze age
Re: BT's superfast broadband network 'risks being empty'

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwikbreaks View Post
Copper oxide doesn't conduct either.

The only place oxidation would matter would be at the joints and they need keeping dry for both. Oxidation on the outside of the cable at voice frequencies wouldn't make any difference unless it was virtually all eaten away. Come to that I doubt it would matter at ADSL/VDSL frequencies either as all TV aerials are made from aluminium and they last for donkeys years totally exposed to the elements. ISTR reading that the main problem with aluminium for ADSL is the extra attenuation over copper.
Oxidisation would occur at any point where the aluminium is exposed to moisture and oxygen. This even includes moisture in the air. It isn't possible to keep all joints 100% airtight over many years.

TV aeriels don't even come into this. To start with they work in a completely different way to cables. And secondly, some more expensive aerials are anodised, which is actually controlled oxidisation, and does insulate. So the insulation doesn't stop radio signals.

It was actually a friend who is a BT engineer who told me about this.
Tim Deegan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 12:04   #19
kwikbreaks
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: May 2010
Services: Plusnet FTTC, FoxSat HDR for TV, Vonage VOIP.
Posts: 2,082
kwikbreaks has reached the bronze age
kwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze age
Re: BT's superfast broadband network 'risks being empty'

Most phone cable joints are gel packed which does exclude the air and other moisture. As I said it doesn't matter whether copper or aluminium is in use - excluding moisture is essential for both.

My example with TV aerials was just to emphasise that surface oxidation is irrelevant - it's the joints that matter and that is whether they are copper or aluminium. Of course copper to aluminium is especially sensitive due to the potential electrolytic action.
kwikbreaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 16:30   #20
Tim Deegan
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Services: 3 phone lines, 100mb broadband, and TV x2 (including one Tivo)
Posts: 2,128
Tim Deegan has reached the bronze age
Tim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze age
Re: BT's superfast broadband network 'risks being empty'

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwikbreaks View Post
Most phone cable joints are gel packed which does exclude the air and other moisture. As I said it doesn't matter whether copper or aluminium is in use - excluding moisture is essential for both.

My example with TV aerials was just to emphasise that surface oxidation is irrelevant - it's the joints that matter and that is whether they are copper or aluminium. Of course copper to aluminium is especially sensitive due to the potential electrolytic action.
We are talking about old connections. In many cases the insulation has broken down, leaving the connections open to the atmosphere. Untreated aluminium is far more prone to oxidisation than copper. As I said previously, I do know about corrosion of metals, and how to prevent it. With aluminium, the minimum corrosion protection for any exposed ends would be an Alocrom 1200 or 1000 treatment, and then to be gel packed. Also what are the terminals made of? As aluminium can react with other metals, causing more corrosion.

Copper doesn't suffer from the same oxidisation as aluminium, especially where contacts are made.
Tim Deegan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:29.


Server: osmium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.