Home News Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | Upstream channel bonding: Any plans to bond more than 2?

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Virgin Media Services > Virgin Media Internet Service

Upstream channel bonding: Any plans to bond more than 2?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 17-08-2017, 22:59   #76
ccarmock
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 683
ccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud of
Re: Upstream channel bonding: Any plans to bond more than 2?

My area is fed from New Malden, and was on 12 down streams for a fair time. a few months ago it went to 16 downstream channels. Even though there was no apparent congestion this jumped to 24 down with 2 up about 4 weeks ago. It was done at the same time the CMTS was swapped for a Cisco 10k

No idea if the upstreams are 16 or 64QAM as the Hitron will not show that information for upstreams. Nor will it show operational config details.
ccarmock is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 17-08-2017, 23:57   #77
Ignitionnet
Pragmatist
 
Ignitionnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 39
Posts: 13,978
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Upstream channel bonding: Any plans to bond more than 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccarmock View Post
No idea if the upstreams are 16 or 64QAM as the Hitron will not show that information for upstreams. Nor will it show operational config details.
I await the Hitron with enthusiasm. I am quite sure I can find ways of making it talk.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-08-2017, 00:47   #78
ccarmock
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 683
ccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud of
Re: Upstream channel bonding: Any plans to bond more than 2?

yes it would be good to have it reveal a bit more. It certainly doesn't provide as much information as the residential devices about the service:-


DOCSIS WAN
DOCSIS Overview
Network Access Permitted
IP Address
Subnet Mask 255.255.248.0
DHCP Lease Time 04 Days,22 Hours,07 Minutes,20 Seconds
Downstream Overview
Force Downstream Frequency (MHz)
Port Frequency (Hz) Modulation Power (dBmV) SNR (dB) Channel
1 139000000 256QAM 4.200 37.356 1
2 147000000 256QAM 4.000 37.356 2
3 155000000 256QAM 3.900 37.356 3
4 163000000 256QAM 3.800 37.356 4
5 171000000 256QAM 3.700 37.356 5
6 179000000 256QAM 3.700 36.387 6
7 187000000 256QAM 3.900 34.484 7
8 195000000 256QAM 3.700 35.780 8
9 203000000 256QAM 3.700 37.356 9
10 211000000 256QAM 3.800 37.636 10
11 219000000 256QAM 3.500 37.356 11
12 227000000 256QAM 3.300 36.610 12
13 235000000 256QAM 3.000 37.356 13
14 243000000 256QAM 2.900 37.356 14
15 251000000 256QAM 2.800 36.610 15
16 259000000 256QAM 2.700 37.356 16
17 267000000 256QAM 2.600 36.610 17
18 275000000 256QAM 2.600 36.610 18
19 283000000 256QAM 2.700 37.356 19
20 291000000 256QAM 2.700 36.610 20
21 299000000 256QAM 2.700 36.610 21
22 307000000 256QAM 2.700 36.610 22
23 315000000 256QAM 2.800 36.610 23
24 323000000 256QAM 2.600 36.387 24
Upstream Overview
Port Frequency (Hz) BandWidth Modulation Power (dBmV) Channel
2 24400000 6400000 ATDMA 40.750 3
3 31000026 6400000 ATDMA 41.250 2
ccarmock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-08-2017, 21:01   #79
Sirius
#HadEnoughOfWin10
 
Sirius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 16,286
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Re: Upstream channel bonding: Any plans to bond more than 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
I await the Hitron with enthusiasm. I am quite sure I can find ways of making it talk.
I have mine in modem mode connected to a Pfsense router. I could not stand the issue where you cannot login in to the hitron software to change settings as it would work sometimes and sometimes it would not.
__________________
Proud to have voted LEAVE and Proud to have not voted for Corbyn the IRA supporter
Sirius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-08-2017, 23:13   #80
Ignitionnet
Pragmatist
 
Ignitionnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 39
Posts: 13,978
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Upstream channel bonding: Any plans to bond more than 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius View Post
I have mine in modem mode connected to a Pfsense router. I could not stand the issue where you cannot login in to the hitron software to change settings as it would work sometimes and sometimes it would not.
I'll have other ways of monitoring the network if the Hitron proves resilient, and obviously I'm not going to poke at it too hard. Terms of service and all that. Don't really fancy being booted back to 50Mb if I'm lucky.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-08-2017, 13:54   #81
ccarmock
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 683
ccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud ofccarmock has much to be proud of
Re: Upstream channel bonding: Any plans to bond more than 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
I'll have other ways of monitoring the network if the Hitron proves resilient, and obviously I'm not going to poke at it too hard. Terms of service and all that. Don't really fancy being booted back to 50Mb if I'm lucky.
The Hitron itself is reliable. The key issue with the service at the moment is the poor download performance at times with the routed subnet option for some people. Progress is being made with that though.
ccarmock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-08-2017, 14:05   #82
Sirius
#HadEnoughOfWin10
 
Sirius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 16,286
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Sirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver blingSirius has a lot of silver bling
Re: Upstream channel bonding: Any plans to bond more than 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccarmock View Post
The Hitron itself is reliable. The key issue with the service at the moment is the poor download performance at times with the routed subnet option for some people. Progress is being made with that though.
I will be very happy when they sort out the login issues.
__________________
Proud to have voted LEAVE and Proud to have not voted for Corbyn the IRA supporter
Sirius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2017, 12:01   #83
Jon22
cf.addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Newport, Shropshire
Posts: 257
Jon22 is on a distinguished roadJon22 is on a distinguished road
Re: Upstream channel bonding: Any plans to bond more than 2?

One thing that I've noticed is that my connection is worse, if going by the tbb graph, when it is bonding the 2 upstream on 39.4 and 46.2MHz. The average latency on the graph is much more consistent when it's on 25.8 and 32.6MHz.
Jon22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:41.


Server: xenon.zmnt.net
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.