Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
12-03-2012, 16:08
|
#1
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Telford
Services: 5G Three 599/21
Posts: 1,299
|
Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
I cannot understand why is Virgin Media upgrade to 60 Meg from 30 Meg in the next 18 months is too long while BT had confirmed that all UK who had FTTC 40 Meg Down /10 Meg Up will be upgrade to 80 Meg Down / 20 Meg Up in early April with a nationwide instant (no area by area roll out)
Virgin Media took too long 18 months area by area roll out is a joke!
Virgin Media 30 Meg down upgrade to 60 Meg down is a joke!
Virgin Media 3 Meg up (upgrade) to 6 Meg up is a joke!
Only BT FTTC 80 Meg down and 20 Meg up in Early April will beat Virgin Media 60 Meg down and 6 Meg up. Virgin Media should have 80 Meg down and 20 Meg up to match BT.
If BT FTTC available in my area, I will say goodbye to Virgin Media because upgrade to double speed in the next 18 months is far too long to wait, and upload should have done better!
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 16:25
|
#2
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Age: 56
Services: XL TV, XL Phone, 30mb BB, 1TB Tivo
Posts: 3,722
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
You go for it, TC! I love a good rant
Personally, I'll wait for my FREE (annual price rise excepted) double-speed upgrade, thanks.
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 16:25
|
#3
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 45
Posts: 13,996
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
Quote:
Originally Posted by telfordcable
I cannot understand why is Virgin Media upgrade to 60 Meg from 30 Meg in the next 18 months is too long while BT had confirmed that all UK who had FTTC 40 Meg Down /10 Meg Up will be upgrade to 80 Meg Down / 20 Meg Up in early April with a nationwide instant (no area by area roll out)
|
They've confirmed no such thing which makes the rest of your post rather superfluous.
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 16:25
|
#4
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,145
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
"rest of the post"????
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 16:31
|
#5
|
Bah Humbug!!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Glasgow
Age: 43
Services: Sky Q 2Tb, Sky Q mini, boxsets and Sports & Movies HD, Sky Fibre unlimited
Posts: 13,866
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
Well as VM is giving all 50Mb customer 100Mb for free and then all 100Mb customers 120Mb again for FREE then your post is really pointless as per usual.
That of course beats the BT FTTC speeds by miles!
__________________
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | 32GB DDR5 6000 | RADEON 7900XT | WD 2TB NVME
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 16:56
|
#6
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Telford
Services: 5G Three 599/21
Posts: 1,299
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
are 120Mb download will get 20 Meg Upload ? I had cancel my 100 Meg as the speed was rubbish every days at peak time down to 57 Meg, waste of money, I revert back to 30 Meg.
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 17:04
|
#7
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stafford
Posts: 4,226
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 18:05
|
#8
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
Yeah, I was going to say, welcome back telfordcable.
Last I head BT's line was trial period of "up to 6 months" from February but some sources have claimed they are aiming for an April launch:
http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/21588...e-80mbit-april
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 18:14
|
#9
|
Body of a God (Buddha)!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nottingham
Services: VVIP 500mb aka Ultimate Oomph (who the hell thought that name up??)
4X V6
Samsung UE55KU6470 4K TV
Posts: 311
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
Here we go again........
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 18:14
|
#10
|
Inactive
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 408
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
The Infinity network (FTTC) is newly built and designed to be able to get upgraded and future proof so its easy for BT to squeeze more out of it without having to do any physical work.
If you have the option to get Infinity and want it then by all means why not go for it, where I live there is no plans by BT to do any roll out so im staying with Virgin.
Forgot to say its better to vote with your feet than just moaning for no reason...imho
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 18:14
|
#11
|
Inactive
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Scotland
Age: 42
Services: Virgin Media - XL Plus package with XXL broadband
SKY HD Multiroom
Freeview HD
Freesat HD
Posts: 2,816
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
Quote:
Originally Posted by telfordcable
I cannot understand why is Virgin Media upgrade to 60 Meg from 30 Meg in the next 18 months is too long while BT had confirmed that all UK who had FTTC 40 Meg Down /10 Meg Up will be upgrade to 80 Meg Down / 20 Meg Up in early April with a nationwide instant (no area by area roll out)
Virgin Media took too long 18 months area by area roll out is a joke!
Virgin Media 30 Meg down upgrade to 60 Meg down is a joke!
Virgin Media 3 Meg up (upgrade) to 6 Meg up is a joke!
Only BT FTTC 80 Meg down and 20 Meg up in Early April will beat Virgin Media 60 Meg down and 6 Meg up. Virgin Media should have 80 Meg down and 20 Meg up to match BT.
If BT FTTC available in my area, I will say goodbye to Virgin Media because upgrade to double speed in the next 18 months is far too long to wait, and upload should have done better!
|
buh bye then go to bt dnt come back to moan as your moans aint constructive man just general rants get yourself a blog
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 18:29
|
#12
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen
Well as VM is giving all 50Mb customer 100Mb for free and then all 100Mb customers 120Mb again for FREE then your post is really pointless as per usual.
That of course beats the BT FTTC speeds by miles!
|
Except that
a) VM are increasing their prices
b) BT are giving 20mb customers (avg. speed 6mb) users up to 80mb (avg speed probably >60mb) for free, a much bigger increase.
c) VM's upload speeds still pale in comparison - remember some areas are stuck on 1.75mb or 5mb upload, even with >100mb download
d) VM's upgrades won't be finishing for a year and a half
e) VM are 3 upgrade cycles behind in some areas (10:1 upload not complete, 100mb rollout not complete, double speed not even started)
f) After the next - imminent - set of upgrades finish, VM will be charging £25 for 50/5* or 100/5 (*not necessarily 50/5 all the time) while BT are expected to be charging £25 for 80/20
* Unless you use it too much, then 50/1.75 or if you use it way too much, 0/0.
---------- Post added at 18:29 ---------- Previous post was at 18:28 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewcrawford23
buh bye then go to bt dnt come back to moan as your moans aint constructive man just general rants get yourself a blog
|
Telford is due to get FTTC on 01/06/2012, so only a few months to tolerate this guy.
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 18:47
|
#13
|
Grumpy Fecker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 64
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 16,760
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
"rest of the post"????
|
Thanks for not quoting his post It means i dont get to see his post
---------- Post added at 18:45 ---------- Previous post was at 18:44 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
Telford is due to get FTTC on 01/06/2012, so only a few months to tolerate this guy.
|
It will not stop him posting bull excreta
i have just realised there are 2 in this thread whose posts i don't see.
---------- Post added at 18:47 ---------- Previous post was at 18:45 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen
Well as VM is giving all 50Mb customer 100Mb for free and then all 100Mb customers 120Mb again for FREE then your post is really pointless as per usual.
That of course beats the BT FTTC speeds by miles!
|
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 18:49
|
#14
|
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Age: 56
Services: XL TV, XL Phone, 30mb BB, 1TB Tivo
Posts: 3,722
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq
Except that
a) VM are increasing their prices
|
Which they do every year, so it's not really relevant.
Quote:
b) BT are giving 20mb customers (avg. speed 6mb)...
|
Last time I checked, just under 70% of cable users get the speed they're paying for. For ADSL, that figure was <50%. Has that changed recently?
Quote:
...users up to 80mb (avg speed probably >60mb) for free, a much bigger increase.
|
Not yet, apparently.
Quote:
c) VM's upload speeds still pale in comparison
|
For most people, I think upload speed isn't an issue.
Quote:
d) VM's upgrades won't be finishing for a year and a half
|
Assuming they don't finish ahead of schedule. Which, if recent news is any indication, they may well finish sooner.
Quote:
f) After the next - imminent - set of upgrades finish, VM will be charging £25 for 50/5...
|
Base price. Not including discounts/mates rates/etc.
Quote:
while BT are expected to be charging £25 for 80/20
|
Well we all know that most current ADSL users don't get anywhere near their headline speed at any time. Any information on how close to headline speed their Infinity product is for the average customer?
|
|
|
12-03-2012, 19:01
|
#15
|
Inactive
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Scotland
Age: 42
Services: Virgin Media - XL Plus package with XXL broadband
SKY HD Multiroom
Freeview HD
Freesat HD
Posts: 2,816
|
Re: Virgin Media should have matched BT FTTC
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlwaring
edited
|
i see ou are still pro virign carl and you dnt work for them lol
see i would perosnal take you comments more seriously if you was not so dismisse and making viring sound good, most peopel do want more upload an not jst the torrent seeder, ideo calls, online storage and plenty of other reasons peopel want mroe uplaod bandwidth but ia int goign to question some of your other poitns as i can tbe bothered i still remebr what you ar eliek for pro virign form teh past, but some points i wouldnt dispute as you are correct in what oyu say
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:57.
|