The state benefits system mega-thread.
04-10-2013, 18:46
|
#706
|
NUTS !!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,912
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
As i see it a necessary step to remove ALL benefits from those lazy buggers who refuse to work, have never worked and will not work. I dont care if it means they get kicked out of there state funded house, it might make them work
|
What happens if there's kids involved?
__________________
Oh what fun it is
|
|
|
04-10-2013, 18:55
|
#707
|
NUTS !!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,912
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by heero_yuy
If they've been financed by the state then the state has a right to use them in whatever way the state seems fit. This is the Marxist way that millipede eschews?
|
As in bringing back the workhouses you mean?
__________________
Oh what fun it is
|
|
|
04-10-2013, 19:10
|
#708
|
Grumpy Fecker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 64
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 16,756
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut
What happens if there's kids involved?
|
If they will not work other than to make babies why should we fund them. You have to make a judgement call. Why should we fund the ones that will not work because they are lazy ***** and just spend the day baby making. ???
---------- Post added at 19:10 ---------- Previous post was at 19:09 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by heero_yuy
Well to open the discussion: Why not?
Slumping about on the sofa watching Jeremy Kyle is not to be an option so perhaps we can get some useful labour (sic) out of these people?
|
And humping the misses every other day to produce yet another baby
|
|
|
04-10-2013, 19:12
|
#709
|
NUTS !!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,912
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
If they will not work other than to make babies why should we fund them. You have to make a judgement call. Why should we fund the ones that will not work because they are lazy ***** and just spend the day baby making. ???
---------- Post added at 19:10 ---------- Previous post was at 19:09 ----------
And humping the misses every other day to produce yet another baby
|
So what do you want to happen to the kids then?
I do agree with what you're saying but I don't have any answers to what happens when kids are involved, so what do you suggest?
__________________
Oh what fun it is
|
|
|
04-10-2013, 19:25
|
#710
|
Grumpy Fecker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 64
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 16,756
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut
So what do you want to happen to the kids then?
I do agree with what you're saying but I don't have any answers to what happens when kids are involved, so what do you suggest?
|
Maybe the kids are put with foster parents in the short term untill the lazy gits who refuse to work get the picture. Your right its difficult but at the moment its a get out clause to allow lazy gits who refuse to work to still get everything given to them on a plate.
|
|
|
04-10-2013, 19:29
|
#711
|
NUTS !!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,912
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
I'm more inclined to say they should only pay for the 1st child only. But starting from X date and not for existing families. At least that would be a start and send out a warning.
__________________
Oh what fun it is
|
|
|
04-10-2013, 19:30
|
#712
|
The Dark Satanic Mills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 12,056
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
So if I understand you correctly you want to deprive people of a pension they have contributed to all their life so that people who have contributed little or nothing get that money ,and you justify this because in your opinion they have enough .I have a modest private pension so does that mean you want to take my state pension away that I have paid all my life
|
I think it should be based on need.
I no longer receive child benefit, and to be honest I didn't need it so I wasn't bothered.
If my private pension pays out enough so that I don't need State pension as well, I'd also happily forgo that too.
I say if, as I can't predict the future.
Savings have to made, and this means and end to universal benefits across the board.
However, any government or prospective party would be mad to propose such a thing.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
|
|
|
04-10-2013, 19:32
|
#713
|
Grumpy Fecker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 64
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 16,756
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut
I'm more inclined to say they should only pay for the 1st child only. But starting from X date and not for existing families. At least that would be a start and send out a warning.
|
Very good idea
|
|
|
04-10-2013, 20:59
|
#714
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,316
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
I agree but wider reform will only work if the benefits system shows it will not be 'blackmailed' into providing child related benefits for those who cynically, or otherwise, set about producing more and more children to secure housing and fund their lifestyles.
|
|
|
04-10-2013, 22:11
|
#715
|
Guest
Location: newcastle upon tyne
Services: Sky Q silver bundle
Sky Q 2TB box
Sky Q mini box
Sky fibre unlimited
Sky Talk evenings and week
Posts: n/a
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peanut
So what do you want to happen to the kids then?
I do agree with what you're saying but I don't have any answers to what happens when kids are involved, so what do you suggest?
|
Hasn't the benefit cap sorted that out ,or at least made a step In the right direction
---------- Post added at 22:11 ---------- Previous post was at 22:09 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
I agree but wider reform will only work if the benefits system shows it will not be 'blackmailed' into providing child related benefits for those who cynically, or otherwise, set about producing more and more children to secure housing and fund their lifestyles.
|
That's exactly what it is ,blackmail ,to force the state to support them by means of the kids
|
|
|
04-10-2013, 22:34
|
#716
|
Grumpy Fecker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 64
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 16,756
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
Hasn't the benefit cap sorted that out ,or at least made a step In the right direction
---------- Post added at 22:11 ---------- Previous post was at 22:09 ----------
That's exactly what it is ,blackmail ,to force the state to support them by means of the kids
|
Indeed they will get Benefits until there kids are 18 and for 15 miniets of fun. Not bad work if you can get it
|
|
|
07-10-2013, 19:13
|
#717
|
Guest
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
I've always said if your on benefit you shouldn't have any new kids and even sign a contract to say you understand that whilst on benefit you agree and understand that if you do have kids you won't get extra money. It is lunacy that children can be used by the cynical to extend their benefit and any reform that stops it is one i'd support. Trouble is our biggest problem with welfare is that all political parties want it there so they can misuse it when they want to massage figures and it's why none of them will ever reform to a practical standpoint.
|
|
|
07-10-2013, 19:27
|
#718
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,316
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius
Indeed they will get Benefits until there kids are 18 and for 15 miniets of fun. Not bad work if you can get it
|
15 minutes??!!...
|
|
|
07-10-2013, 20:19
|
#719
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,325
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
|
And you're the Duracell rabbit, I take it?
|
|
|
08-10-2013, 10:55
|
#720
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,798
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Lets make one thing clear in regards to lazy gits who don't want to work and sit on their backside and claim benefit.
When l got made redundant four years ago, l did everything possible to get a job, BUT l needed a job that paid a salary to keep my family - approx 18/19 kg per year.
The jobs that were on offer were between 15/17 kg per year. I was not prepared to take a job that paid that amount. I was not lazy my benefit was £75.00 per week for my family and out of that that l had to pay rent and council tax.
I worked damn hard to find a job, sitting in my car and taking company details (which l still have today to remind myself) then go home and send emails and faxes to the companies.
I got more interviews that way then going through JS and all the government talk of getting work. I finally got my present job via my voluntary work.
Its ok for members to blast people at having the lack of courage to find work, but most of the work which may be out - does not pay enough.
Some members may say l work for 16 kg a year, good for you, but not everyone sits on there backside and claim benefit- which you are entitled too.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (0 members and 7 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52.
|