50M Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS) - Page 171

GrimUpNorth · 04-11-2012, 16:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq

C:\Users\Administrator>ping bbc.co.uk

Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.241.131] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=241
Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=241
Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=241
Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=241

Ping statistics for 212.58.241.131:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 20ms

C:\>ping www.bbc.co.uk
Pinging www.bbc.net.uk [212.58.246.92] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.58.246.92: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=53
Reply from 212.58.246.92: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=53
Reply from 212.58.246.92: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=53
Reply from 212.58.246.92: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=53
Ping statistics for 212.58.246.92:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 15ms, Maximum = 18ms, Average = 16ms

Bit high them there pings qas

Cheers

Grim

qasdfdsaq · 04-11-2012, 17:22

That would be because of distance and funky routing.

Being in Scotland there's only so low you can go:

C:\Users\Administrator>ping bbc.co.uk

Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.241.131] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=242
Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=242
Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=242
Reply from 212.58.241.131: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 212.58.241.131:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 11ms, Average = 11ms

---------- Post added at 17:22 ---------- Previous post was at 17:18 ----------

Ooh, looks like VM's peering at LINX is overloaded again. Private peering doesn't appear affected. Enjoying your bumps tonight people?

Spoiler:

thenry · 04-11-2012, 18:17

its settled...

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

babis3g · 04-11-2012, 19:07

gone for holidays and turn off my draytek but forgot the thinkbroadband monitor on
Coming back after few weeks when turn on the draytek + SH my ip changed

i looked the TB monitor and for 3 weeks was all red then about 5 days ago my old ip gone live again and is so bad
Guessing some one else using my old ip

my new ip (red spike is from my own restart of the draytek and a change of a dns server cos today was little slower the respond of the loading pages)

---------- Post added at 19:07 ---------- Previous post was at 18:51 ----------

aslo the family abroad having a small 2 mb (caped) connection by ISP "conn-x"
i manage to set up a TB monitor with the supplied modem from their ISP
i also ping via the command prompt the thinkbroadband/ monitor,ping and got 60 ms(from greece to UK)
so here the monitor that i kept it to remember

qasdfdsaq · 04-11-2012, 19:35

I was pretty horrified earlier when I saw neo-tech's graph:

04-11-2012, 20:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry

its settled...

Yours might have TH, mine hasn't

thenry · 04-11-2012, 20:34

nice. are the high usage periods consistent (times and days)

the bumps back btw

Chrysalis · 04-11-2012, 20:47

qas lol I seen your post but no graph, then went to another tab to get my graph and now see the graph when I clicked this tab again, obviously my connection was taking that long to download the image :p

here is mine.

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

its pretty much not useable at the moment. The red I hopped to a different US but as can see it didnt improve anything.

04-11-2012, 21:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry

nice. are the high usage periods consistent (times and days)

the bumps back btw

It seems to be OK during the middle of the day but as it gets later it worsens.

Thursday 1st November:

Friday 2nd:

Saturday 3rd:

thenry · 04-11-2012, 21:29

have you sent this over to VM? create a log if you havent including those daily links. monitor how much your using too or able to etc.

04-11-2012, 21:33

I'll do that in the morning mate. Not long got back from Basingstoke so need sleep

Chrysalis · 04-11-2012, 21:52

my connection appears to be buffering over 6 seconds. If I type something in ssh it appears 6 seconds later.

qasdfdsaq · 05-11-2012, 04:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis

qas lol I seen your post but no graph, then went to another tab to get my graph and now see the graph when I clicked this tab again, obviously my connection was taking that long to download the image :p

here is mine.

its pretty much not useable at the moment. The red I hopped to a different US but as can see it didnt improve anything.

That looks like a VMNG300 right? I still feel sorry for you getting this *bleep* service after so long, as you know I was thankfully able to escape earlier this year.

Looks like a very sudden increase in latency/congestion around 12pm though, much faster than you'd expect from "natural" congestion. Same goes for jempalmer. I wonder what it is...

Chrysalis · 05-11-2012, 08:45

I agree the sudden onset was unusual as well as the intensity, with past weeks I have had slow buildups of poor download performance but generally latency/jitter remained ok.

midday is when I started watching iplayer F1 stream, which made me suspect some new traffic management trial, but remember also it could still be easily congestion knowing how VM works a single user can have a huge impact and now VM are rolling out 133/12 services.

05-11-2012, 20:32

This is getting beyond a joke, my TBB graph is taking around 3 or 4 seconds to resolve.

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]