Government & Post Election Discussion
10-10-2018, 07:32
|
#1501
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,305
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Bit of a wake-up call here from the IMF on the UK's finances.
Quote:
Britain is languishing close to the bottom of the international league table for the strength of its public finances, the IMF said on Wednesday, with only Portugal’s long-term position deeper in the red.
The new figures, which compare the assets available to government with its long-term liabilities, show the UK government having less than £3tn in assets and £5tn of liabilities, indicating a negative net worth of more than £2tn.
Countries with deep negative net worth are likely to have to tax more heavily in future and run budget surpluses to bring assets back into line with liabilities.
The UK’s poor position reflects the fact that the government owns few assets compared with other countries after a wave of privatisation in the 1980s and 1990s, but has big public debts and future pension liabilities to finance in the decades ahead.
|
https://www.ft.com/content/3ee09db6-...6-b9069bde0956
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 08:21
|
#1502
|
The Invisible Woman
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton.
Age: 71
Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo
Posts: 40,170
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
|
Expect the response. Experts! IMF! What do they know?
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 10:42
|
#1503
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,618
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
|
You'd better not vote Labour, then, if these figures worry you!
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 11:14
|
#1504
|
Still alive and fighting
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the land of beyond and beyond.
Services: XL BB, 3 360 boxes , XL TV.
Posts: 56,359
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
You'd better not vote Labour, then, if these figures worry you!
|
But l don't give a diddly squat about Labour as we are talking about the incumbent government who have had plenty of time to sort things out but alas you come out with your usual predictable default Theresa May waving response to anybody who is critical of HMG as they are the government now end of..
__________________
“The only lesson you can learn from history is that it repeats itself”
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 12:04
|
#1505
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,618
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
But l don't give a diddly squat about Labour as we are talking about the incumbent government who have had plenty of time to sort things out but alas you come out with your usual predictable default Theresa May waving response to anybody who is critical of HMG as they are the government now end of..
|
I think I've done more than enough to explain my position on this, Den - it will get very boring if I have to keep saying the same things to justify my arguments.
However, it is relevant to look at what Labour did before and what it would do under Corbyn. Our economic position is complex to deal with, but it would be in a much worse state under Corbyn. We have seen some of his spending plans and they are absolutely mind boggling. If he went through with these under a Labour Government, he would create a situation where today's figures look like Utopia.
Of course the figures are bad - there was this banking crisis, you see, and Labour had no money put by in case of an emergency. Gordon Brown spent all the reserves on a massive spending spree so when the credit crunch came, there was no money to spare.
It fell to the Conservatives, with no money left, hampered in what they could do with the Lib Dems in coalition, to sort that mess out. They could have done it more quickly of course, but that would have increased austerity. That does not appear to be what you and many others like you would have wanted.
Those people who argue we should have borrowed even more in a vain attempt to put a sticking plaster over the nation's finances should not be allowed credit cards of their own.
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 23:31
|
#1506
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,305
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
You'd better not vote Labour, then, if these figures worry you!
|
They do worry me but I don't take a partisan view on proceedings. It's interesting that the IMF seems to lay some of the blame at the UK selling off the family silver through privatisation so we have nothing for the bad times.
A bit like companies like MG Rover who sold off their land and IP to pay the day-to-day bills but eventually had no assets left to sell. Those privatisation sales were Conservative not Labour policies.
|
|
|
11-10-2018, 07:37
|
#1507
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,618
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
They do worry me but I don't take a partisan view on proceedings. It's interesting that the IMF seems to lay some of the blame at the UK selling off the family silver through privatisation so we have nothing for the bad times.
A bit like companies like MG Rover who sold off their land and IP to pay the day-to-day bills but eventually had no assets left to sell. Those privatisation sales were Conservative not Labour policies.
|
Isn't that a rather strange argument? If we sell, we are making money, which can be used to pay off debt. We pay it at that point to reduce the interest we are paying on the debt. If we sell it later rather than earlier, we are in a worse position because of all the additional interest we have paid.
It is also worth mentioning that privatised companies generally make more money than nationalised ones, and the government reaps the benefit of the increased profits made through taxation. The eastern rail franchise was a remarkable exception to that general principle.
As an aside, and before anyone else points this out, some contracts for services and the resulting franchises have been extremely badly managed, resulting in collapses and poor levels of service in some areas. Lessons must be learned from this in the future, because each collapse and each evidence of poor service brings the system into disrepute, despite the benefits that can be seen in those areas that are managed properly.
|
|
|
11-10-2018, 08:08
|
#1508
|
10 yrs same company 😁
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Expanding Town with crap roads
Age: 64
Services: ? BB, basic phone. Share of Disney+
Posts: 7,665
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
I think I've done more than enough to explain my position on this, Den - it will get very boring if I have to keep saying the same things to justify my arguments.
However, it is relevant to look at what Labour did before and what it would do under Corbyn. Our economic position is complex to deal with, but it would be in a much worse state under Corbyn. We have seen some of his spending plans and they are absolutely mind boggling. If he went through with these under a Labour Government, he would create a situation where today's figures look like Utopia.
Of course the figures are bad - there was this banking crisis, you see, and Labour had no money put by in case of an emergency. Gordon Brown spent all the reserves on a massive spending spree so when the credit crunch came, there was no money to spare.
It fell to the Conservatives, with no money left, hampered in what they could do with the Lib Dems in coalition, to sort that mess out. They could have done it more quickly of course, but that would have increased austerity. That does not appear to be what you and many others like you would have wanted.
Those people who argue we should have borrowed even more in a vain attempt to put a sticking plaster over the nation's finances should not be allowed credit cards of their own.
|
Neither Labour or the Conservatives look at finance properly. What should happen is during the good times, taxes should go up and be invested for the bad times, so that taxes can be cut to help people in the lean times.
Instead, taxes are cut when people have spare, and raised when people are short.
Meanwhile, how many years should a government be in power before they stop blaming their predecessors?
|
|
|
11-10-2018, 11:42
|
#1509
|
The Invisible Woman
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton.
Age: 71
Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo
Posts: 40,170
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angua
Neither Labour or the Conservatives look at finance properly. What should happen is during the good times, taxes should go up and be invested for the bad times, so that taxes can be cut to help people in the lean times.
Instead, taxes are cut when people have spare, and raised when people are short.
Meanwhile, how many years should a government be in power before they stop blaming their predecessors?
|
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
|
|
|
11-10-2018, 12:03
|
#1510
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 13,739
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angua
Neither Labour or the Conservatives look at finance properly. What should happen is during the good times, taxes should go up and be invested for the bad times, so that taxes can be cut to help people in the lean times.
Instead, taxes are cut when people have spare, and raised when people are short.
Meanwhile, how many years should a government be in power before they stop blaming their predecessors?
|
Depends on how long it takes to reverse the damage of a mismanaged economy etc.
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|
|
|
11-10-2018, 12:11
|
#1511
|
10 yrs same company 😁
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Expanding Town with crap roads
Age: 64
Services: ? BB, basic phone. Share of Disney+
Posts: 7,665
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
[/B]
Depends on how long it takes to reverse the damage of a mismanaged economy etc.
|
No one seemed to be sufficiently convinced that the Tories were the best party for the job at the last election, but then unstable governments are what is likely with our electoral system and devolved parliaments with parochial political parties.
|
|
|
11-10-2018, 12:16
|
#1512
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 13,739
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angua
No one seemed to be sufficiently convinced that the Tories were the best party for the job at the last election, but then unstable governments are what is likely with our electoral system and devolved parliaments with parochial political parties.
|
You can always get into politics and and try to change it with the help of like minded people if there are enough of them.
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|
|
|
11-10-2018, 12:45
|
#1513
|
The Dark Satanic Mills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 12,080
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angua
Neither Labour or the Conservatives look at finance properly. What should happen is during the good times, taxes should go up and be invested for the bad times, so that taxes can be cut to help people in the lean times.
Instead, taxes are cut when people have spare, and raised when people are short.
Meanwhile, how many years should a government be in power before they stop blaming their predecessors?
|
Indeed how long out of power does a government have to be.
As we all know the mantra 30+ years on is still "It's all Thatchers Fault"
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
|
|
|
11-10-2018, 12:48
|
#1514
|
10 yrs same company 😁
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Expanding Town with crap roads
Age: 64
Services: ? BB, basic phone. Share of Disney+
Posts: 7,665
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
You can always get into politics and and try to change it with the help of like minded people if there are enough of them.
|
Been there, done that, bought the T-Shirt.
When even local political groups replace the good councillors who stray from the party line and actually represent their ward, there is neither the money or the will to change anything. In addition, how can anyone change the system when the party currently in power is only delaying reducing the number of MPs (and making their hold on government stronger in the process) because the DUP are holding a gun to their heads.
Until the Conservatives support a decent PR electoral system, nothing will change, their sheep are sufficient in number to prevent them needing to.
|
|
|
11-10-2018, 19:33
|
#1515
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,618
|
Re: Government & Post Election Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angua
Neither Labour or the Conservatives look at finance properly. What should happen is during the good times, taxes should go up and be invested for the bad times, so that taxes can be cut to help people in the lean times.
Instead, taxes are cut when people have spare, and raised when people are short.
Meanwhile, how many years should a government be in power before they stop blaming their predecessors?
|
You are right to a degree, but at least the Conservatives put some of the spare money away. Labour just tend to blow it all.
---------- Post added at 19:28 ---------- Previous post was at 19:26 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angua
Been there, done that, bought the T-Shirt.
When even local political groups replace the good councillors who stray from the party line and actually represent their ward, there is neither the money or the will to change anything. In addition, how can anyone change the system when the party currently in power is only delaying reducing the number of MPs (and making their hold on government stronger in the process) because the DUP are holding a gun to their heads.
Until the Conservatives support a decent PR electoral system, nothing will change, their sheep are sufficient in number to prevent them needing to.
|
It's hard enough to make decisions now! PR will just make it harder, as a permanent arrangement.
If you want a strong government that is able to make decisions, don't vote for proportional representation!
---------- Post added at 19:30 ---------- Previous post was at 19:28 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angua
No one seemed to be sufficiently convinced that the Tories were the best party for the job at the last election, but then unstable governments are what is likely with our electoral system and devolved parliaments with parochial political parties.
|
Quite clearly, the financial mess, and the austerity measures that were needed to sort that out, was down to Labour.
So yes, 8 years down the line, if Labour think they cannot be blamed for our current situation, they'd better think again!
[/COLOR]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angua
Neither Labour or the Conservatives look at finance properly. What should happen is during the good times, taxes should go up and be invested for the bad times, so that taxes can be cut to help people in the lean times.
Instead, taxes are cut when people have spare, and raised when people are short.
Meanwhile, how many years should a government be in power before they stop blaming their predecessors?
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:18.
|