Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
We must be missing something surely? Why wouldn't the evidence be ruled inadmissible, the case thrown out by he judge and/or the CPS subjected to an inquiry when this emerged in court?
I don't know that much about the technicalities of the legal system but I would assume that manipulating evidence would be a serious charge here?
|
Evidence is manipulated all the time to show a certain version of events in a clearer manner.
It's normally presented alongside the original for fairness.
Dropping CCTV to half speed would be pretty apparent and as long as it wasn't a clear attempt to deceive the judge/jury there is nothing wrong with it.
Join CF
You are here: 
