Mr Angry |
04-02-2012 02:08 |
Re: Falkland Islands: Tensions Rising again ahead of Prince William visit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
(Post 35375079)
It's always 'they'. I don't understand. When we discuss what the military should be used for you don't need to be in it to have an opinion.
|
That's right, you don't. However, in my experience, the opinion of current or ex servicemen & women counts for far more and is better qualified than that of anyone else.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
(Post 35375079)
The Falklands in British soil
|
Again with the opinion. The Falklands being "British soil" is not a given. That is the very crux of the issue at hand. If it were the case that the Falklands had simply detached themselves from Portsmouth or somesuch seaboard element of Britain several hundred years ago and elected to drift south then perhaps you might have a point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
(Post 35375079)
, what is the point of the British army if it's not to defend Britons and their land?
|
Regime change, foreign invasion / occupation, peace keeping - loads of different things in addition to defending "Britons and their land".
If only it were that simple.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry
(Post 35375113)
In this case it is more of a deterrent aganist Argentina, so that no matter how much they complain about the so called "British Occupation" of the Falklands, they would never dare invade alone, unless the whole of South America were involved...
|
Bonkers. As usual...
|