Home News Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > General Discussion > Current Affairs

KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-03-2012, 12:45   #16
Chris
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 36,871
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Precisely. But that doesn't mean that as a society we shouldn't question the things that are done "all the time". Especially where life and well-being are concerned.

Personally I am deeply uncomfortable with the way that abortion has become just another contraceptive for some and a means of avoiding the inconvenience of a disabled child for others. The woman's right to choose seems to have entirely supplanted the child's right to life, and all on the basis of what you agree is an entirely arbitrary line drawn across the middle of their development in the womb.
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 02-03-2012, 12:49   #17
Alan Fry
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Radio Cairo, Hampstead, London
Services: 100 MB Broadband, XL Tv, Sky Sports and Movies HD, all other prenium channels, 3 TIVO, 2 V HD
Posts: 2,937
Alan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecart
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Where have I heard this before, from the Nazi's, this is an outdated policy, if you cannot look after the child, then give it up for adoption!!!

For the moment they are conceived, I consider them a human and “real” person, so it is unfair to kill them at a time when they are very young. That would be murder!!!

If it was legal to do this then Stevie Wonder would have been killed at birth!

If my one of my children was born disabled, I would not care; I would care and love that child!!!

Killing babies shortly after birth is 100% wrong and should remain illegal, hence I’m not keen on abortion (not on religious grounds)!!!

Also, why should a baby die because its parents are poor?

For once I am with Pro-Life groups!

Anyone that agrees with her should reconsider themselves!

---------- Post added at 11:49 ---------- Previous post was at 11:48 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hom3r View Post
Even the devil wouldn't want these people. Hell has is own place for people who kill babies.
Along with mass murders, child abusers and wealthy people who have done wrong!
Alan Fry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 13:07   #18
martyh
Guest
 
Location: newcastle upon tyne
Services: Sky Q silver bundle Sky Q 2TB box Sky Q mini box Sky fibre unlimited Sky Talk evenings and week
Posts: n/a
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
The ethicists have raised a point that is very, very uncomfortable for those that advocate abortion IMO. The fact is, we have no scientific definition for when personhood begins. What we have is a fudged moral compromise, using a vaguely scientific measure of 'viability', to determine when abortion can happen and when it cannot. This definition isn't even universal, it applies in the UK but is different elsewhere.

The reason the argument is so uncomfortable for pro-choicers is that it exposes the arbitrary nature of our current law to cold, hard logic. There is no cold, hard, dispassionate reason why a severely disabled baby can be killed in the womb but not immediately post-birth. The reason for not killing such a child after birth is not scientific but moral. And if we accept the basis of the debate is a moral one, rather than hiding behind supposedly scientific arguments about "viability", what is that morality to be based on? Where should we draw the line, and why?
Excellent post Chris .A good example to use for the purposes of discussion is that of Downs Syndrome babies .It is permitted to abort Downs babies should the parents be aware of the disability but we all know that Downs babies can have a full and happy life ,indeed i believe some members on this forum have Downs babies.So what justification can there be for aborting one aside from the parents wish not to raise a disabled child ,which ,up to a point we allow but there is no scientific justification and very little moral justification to permitt it .If we are asking is there any justification to euthenise such children post birth then following the accepted logic applied to Downs babies then there is no reason why not apart from society's own moral outrage which isn't always logical but does set the rules

---------- Post added at 12:07 ---------- Previous post was at 12:03 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry View Post
Where have I heard this before, from the Nazi's, this is an outdated policy, if you cannot look after the child, then give it up for adoption!!!

For the moment they are conceived, I consider them a human and “real” person, so it is unfair to kill them at a time when they are very young. That would be murder!!!

If it was legal to do this then Stevie Wonder would have been killed at birth!

If my one of my children was born disabled, I would not care; I would care and love that child!!!

Killing babies shortly after birth is 100% wrong and should remain illegal, hence I’m not keen on abortion (not on religious grounds)!!!

Also, why should a baby die because its parents are poor?

For once I am with Pro-Life groups!

Anyone that agrees with her should reconsider themselves!

---------- Post added at 11:49 ---------- Previous post was at 11:48 ----------



Along with mass murders, child abusers and wealthy people who have done wrong!
Once again Alan you have totally failed to understand what is being discussed nobody is advocating this and nobody is suggesting ,even remotely,that it should be adopted as policy
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 13:07   #19
Osem
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,316
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Osem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered starsOsem is seeing silvered stars
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
Almost 190,000 babies we killed - legally - in 2010 in England and Wales. We hide the fact behind the euphemism "abortion".

By your definition there are rather a lot of not-people out there...
As much as I dislike abortion, I don't consider aborting a foetus the same as killing a baby so my view stands. In an ideal world it wouldn't be necessary to abort anything but sadly we don't live in an ideal world and for all sorts of reasons it has been decided in the UK that abortion under strictly controlled circumstances is legal.
Osem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 13:10   #20
martyh
Guest
 
Location: newcastle upon tyne
Services: Sky Q silver bundle Sky Q 2TB box Sky Q mini box Sky fibre unlimited Sky Talk evenings and week
Posts: n/a
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem View Post
As much as I dislike abortion, I don't consider aborting a foetus the same as killing a baby so my view stands.
Nothing wrong with that point of view ,i would hazard a guess that most of society feels the same hence abortion laws
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 13:27   #21
Alan Fry
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Radio Cairo, Hampstead, London
Services: 100 MB Broadband, XL Tv, Sky Sports and Movies HD, all other prenium channels, 3 TIVO, 2 V HD
Posts: 2,937
Alan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecart
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem View Post
As much as I dislike abortion, I don't consider aborting a foetus the same as killing a baby so my view stands. In an ideal world it wouldn't be necessary to abort anything but sadly we don't live in an ideal world and for all sorts of reasons it has been decided in the UK that abortion under strictly controlled circumstances is legal.
There should be more restrictions on abortion!
Alan Fry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 13:34   #22
Hugh
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,044
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry View Post
There should be more restrictions on abortion!
Please elucidate your position....
__________________
There is always light.
If only were brave enough to see it.
If only were brave enough to be it
.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Hugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 13:42   #23
Alan Fry
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Radio Cairo, Hampstead, London
Services: 100 MB Broadband, XL Tv, Sky Sports and Movies HD, all other prenium channels, 3 TIVO, 2 V HD
Posts: 2,937
Alan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecart
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
Please elucidate your position....
I meant that abortion should be discouraged as a so called form of "contraception"

Maybe it should also only be used in medical emergencies!

But I accept that many people will disagree
Alan Fry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 13:51   #24
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,206
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
The ethicists have raised a point that is very, very uncomfortable for those that advocate abortion IMO. The fact is, we have no scientific definition for when personhood begins. What we have is a fudged moral compromise, using a vaguely scientific measure of 'viability', to determine when abortion can happen and when it cannot. This definition isn't even universal, it applies in the UK but is different elsewhere.

The reason the argument is so uncomfortable for pro-choicers is that it exposes the arbitrary nature of our current law to cold, hard logic. There is no cold, hard, dispassionate reason why a severely disabled baby can be killed in the womb but not immediately post-birth. The reason for not killing such a child after birth is not scientific but moral. And if we accept the basis of the debate is a moral one, rather than hiding behind supposedly scientific arguments about "viability", what is that morality to be based on? Where should we draw the line, and why?
I agree the line where something becomes a 'person' is largely a moral question. There isn't a hard and clear line into when that happens but this has obviously always been the case and, as previously mentioned, the lack of clear lines is an issue elsewhere such as the age of consent.

I would say a person exists once they are born. At that point they exist in the world, we name them, we start counting their age, they see the world and they can breathe, pump blood, and perform the basics of life unaided. Obviously we can't start aborting just prior to birth and this is somewhat a matter of practicality. It really hard and I can see why people think life begins as conception, after all at that point you are dening what will become a person their life. Someone who would exist now will not.

I think abortion should be legal. It's not something which is good, I am not pro-abortion in the sense I like it. However it's safer and more realistic to have it performed legally by the health service and it can be the better alternative in some cases. We should always encourage contraception to avoid an abortion being needed.

Sorry if this post is a bit all over the place. Typing it in a nosy train on my iPad.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 16:26   #25
mertle
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
mertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quads
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Would not agree with it one minute.

I actually dont agree with abortion on grounds of the baby will be born disabled even. Reason why my sister became pregnant for third time during pregnancy they can have test see if baby was developing correctly.

She was told the baby would be born with disabilty was advised to abort the pregnancy. Thankful she and her husband said if god wished her to be born disabled then it will be born so.

She caried the child to birth my sister's daughter now a woman of 23 she is NOT DISABLED and perfect thank good. It turns out the test is aint acurate its I think 70% acuracy rate. So how many parents scared of the situation aborted perfectly good baby. How many was told they was fine turned out disabled. Would love to see if stats are out there.

I believe we would hit very dangerous ground. Which would equate to that fabled hitler moto of the perfect race he craved for.

I doubt the idea would get much support thankfully
mertle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 16:30   #26
Alan Fry
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Radio Cairo, Hampstead, London
Services: 100 MB Broadband, XL Tv, Sky Sports and Movies HD, all other prenium channels, 3 TIVO, 2 V HD
Posts: 2,937
Alan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecartAlan Fry has upset the applecart
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Quote:
Originally Posted by mertle View Post
Would not agree with it one minute.

I actually dont agree with abortion on grounds of the baby will be born disabled even. Reason why my sister became pregnant for third time during pregnancy they can have test see if baby was developing correctly.

She was told the baby would be born with disabilty was advised to abort the pregnancy. Thankful she and her husband said if god wished her to be born disabled then it will be born so.

She caried the child to birth my sister's daughter now a woman of 23 she is NOT DISABLED and perfect thank good. It turns out the test is aint acurate its I think 70% acuracy rate. So how many parents scared of the situation aborted perfectly good baby. How many was told they was fine turned out disabled. Would love to see if stats are out there.

I believe we would hit very dangerous ground. Which would equate to that fabled hitler moto of the perfect race he craved for.

I doubt the idea would get much support thankfully
That is a very heart warming story!

I feel abortion on grounds of the baby will be born disabled is wrong as is killing it after birth!
Alan Fry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 17:16   #27
mertle
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
mertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quads
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry View Post
That is a very heart warming story!

I feel abortion on grounds of the baby will be born disabled is wrong as is killing it after birth!
thank you its joyous indeed now she has her own daughter who is 3 years old trouble

I remember the tears like yesterday the relief when she and husband came through told us all her baby was perfect baby girl. It only after time we questioned how could it happen. Why should joyious period of birth be put under such anxiety. To be faced with the biggest decision of your life to abort the pregnancy.

I cant remember what they said the disibilty was but it was not good think it was down syndrome or spina bifda level.
mertle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 17:24   #28
TheNorm
Inactive
 
TheNorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge
Services: Sky TV, VM TV, 20meg bb, tel, and a lobster (but the lobster died).
Posts: 4,349
TheNorm has a nice shiny star
TheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny star
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
...Personally I am deeply uncomfortable with the way that abortion has become just another contraceptive for some and a means of avoiding the inconvenience of a disabled child for others. ....
There are more than the two possibilities that you mention; for example, pregnancy following rape.

Anyway, I thought the reason David Steel championed his bill in 1966 was to get rid of "back street" abortions*. The challenge is to change the law without going back to the "bad old days".

* http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...society.health
TheNorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 17:25   #29
martyh
Guest
 
Location: newcastle upon tyne
Services: Sky Q silver bundle Sky Q 2TB box Sky Q mini box Sky fibre unlimited Sky Talk evenings and week
Posts: n/a
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNorm View Post
There are more than the two possibilities that you mention; for example, pregnancy following rape.

Anyway, I thought the reason David Steel championed his bill in 1966 was to get rid of "back street" abortions*. The challenge is to change the law without going back to the "bad old days".

* http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...society.health

Does the law need changing ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 17:28   #30
TheNorm
Inactive
 
TheNorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge
Services: Sky TV, VM TV, 20meg bb, tel, and a lobster (but the lobster died).
Posts: 4,349
TheNorm has a nice shiny star
TheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny starTheNorm has a nice shiny star
Re: KILL unwanted or disabled babies at birth as they are not a real person'

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
Does the law need changing ?
Isn't that the topic under discussion?

By the way, here is a link to the full scientific paper, in case anyone wants to read what was actually written before it was churned into a headline by a "journalist":

http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/201...11-100411.full
TheNorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:30.


Server: osmium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.