Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh
He can't ban someone based on religion which is what he is trying to do ,many top US lawyers are saying he's violating the 1st amendment
|
The LAW says he can impose a ban. As the LAW says he CAN, is it possible for anybody to come up with a hypothetical example where everybody could agree it does apply? As other than a complete worldwide, no example exists, then the original LAW stands as it HASN'T been reversed. The Executive Order OVERRIDES any other consideration, which is aimed at non-Executive Order decisions and at INDIVIDUALS, not groups.