Quote:
Originally Posted by Micky Finn
Wow! You're a happy-go-lucky sort!! Nothing like a bit of infantile patronising, eh? I'd be grateful if you didn't come back with that sort of nonsense next time. Could you possibly flag up where, exactly, I displayed any arrogance in the post above?
|
You claimed CPW's explanation is "ridiculous" without realising it's exactly and entirely true.
You claimed VM 'couldn't possibly' do something that is a very fundamental and basic component of how mobile networks work.
You call a concept 'ludicrous' even though it's the entire basis of how the UK mobile market works.
Quote:
|
I spent much of my holidays on the phone to CS at both parties, basically being passed from pillar to post with no resolution in sight. You'll forgive me if I became a little frustrated by the process.
|
Your frustration is perfectly justified. Your rants about CPW's explanation being 'ridiculous' 'ludicrous' and 'fruity anglo saxon' are not. You insist on blaming CPW when they're just following the process dictated to them by VM, and refuse to accept the truth.
Ironically it seems that you blaming and patronising CPW for something that VM needs to fix is more important to you than actually getting to the bottom of the situation.
Quote:
|
Far from explaining the situation wrongly to VM, they had the whole story, verbatim, including full transcripts of conversations between myself and CPW and any emails forwarded on to them. So no, not wrongly - don't jump in again without checking some facts, please
|
Seeing as the only 'fact' you've presented so far is the fact that
you've completely misunderstood the situation and haven't the faintest clue how the process works, what other 'facts' am I supposed to check?
Quote:
|
it seems self-importance is the prevailing currency....
|
Sorry, your self-importance is not accepted as payment for my services. Acceptable payment methods are:
Paypal
Bitcoin
Mod edit.