Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
And yet, Cox smirkingly tells us the "facts" about the Cosmos, the Stars an' everythin' without knowing if any of it is true. He is best roundly ignored for spouting unverifiable opinion. Actually, I suppose it goes to prove your point about free speech but perhaps not as intended  |
It's true as far as current scientific knowledge understands.
---------- Post added at 20:12 ---------- Previous post was at 20:10 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
Unverified 'facts' are proof of nothing. My own Theory of irrelevance: COx=£4bs2.
If Prof Cox was a poster here, you'd be the first to ask him for a link to his proclaimed 'evidence' . |
If it's a fact it is by definition not unverified
---------- Post added at 20:18 ---------- Previous post was at 20:12 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
Nah, his pontifications don't merit discussion.
.
|
Well if what he talks about is beyond your intellect, fair enough, don't worry yourself about it. I find him clear, passionate and undeniably knowledgeable. Furthermore he has done for physics what Attenborough did for natural history, made is accessible for the masses.
He should congratulated not dismissed by the ignorant