Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus
I was going to say the same thing and you beat me to it. I have never watched it but I think it is a bit of a joke. If they are going to say that all the "premium" series are on other channels because they can afford to pay more then what is the point. They make a bit thing about being "ad free" like it is all anyone cares about but when it comes down to it nobody is going to watch and ad free channel if it is has average/sub par programming. Hopefully this will be an important lesson for them. Channel 4 can afford to pay more because they know they are going to get the money back from advertising revenue.
|
To go with the sub par programming soon people will have to endure sub par presenters on them to simply because of their skin colour, gender or disability rather than any specific ability to present.
---------- Post added at 08:43 ---------- Previous post was at 08:41 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenMcr
The BBC can never win in these situations.
If they had spent the money that was asked for Bake Off, then many people (and certain media outlets) would complain that the BBC were spending 'their' money on 'rubbish'.
If they don't spend the money they're accused of letting decent programmes go.
|
Perhaps if they weren't spending so much cash on payoffs they'd have a bit left for programmes
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.dai...android-h3g-gb