View Single Post
Old 06-02-2015, 09:57   #4922
horseman
cf.geek
 
horseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hove East sussex
Age: 73
Posts: 574
horseman has reached the bronze age
horseman has reached the bronze agehorseman has reached the bronze age
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
Two issues at play here.

1) DOCSIS upstream is TDMA which is more prone to latency caused by utilisation - there are 2 contention points at play, contending to send your request for a grant and then waiting for the grant time to actually transmit the data.
2) DOCSIS allows large traffic bursts to request more bandwidth as part of a data burst so favours continuous large amounts of upstream traffic over small bursts such as a response to a TBB ping.

Downstream uses a scheduler at the CMTS. The pipe has to max out, with interest, in order to increase latency substantially.
Cheer Carl, Yet again I'm obliged and indebted for your patient elaboration (albeit I was personally reasonably familiar with the concept) and eagerly await your concise explanation when someone (other than me) asks "What about dual token bucket rate shaping"?

---------- Post added at 09:57 ---------- Previous post was at 09:53 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
The scheduler isn't a traffic management scheme, it doesn't really have any intelligence to speak of......
Sort of reminds you of some Technical Support Forums doesn't it? :p
horseman is offline   Reply With Quote