View Single Post
Old 11-04-2017, 08:49   #1162
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,226
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Brexit: Article 50 Has Been Triggered !

Quote:
Originally Posted by passingbat View Post
So, in essence, you are prepared to sell the UK's rights to self determination in areas of taxes, laws and borders, to an outside institution, for what you perceive as economic gain. Economic gain of which there is no absolute proof, and indeed, the opposite view from some quarters.

Sadly, you remind me of Esau, who sold his Birthright to Jacob, for a pot of hot stew. Genesis 25:29-34
International trade has brought prosperity to the world.
But you are quite happy to see the UK's great companies sold off to the highest foreign bidders due to the weak post-Brexit vote £ (Odeon to the Chinese, ARM, our biggest tech company to the Japanese). This is not taking back control, it's losing it.

---------- Post added at 08:38 ---------- Previous post was at 08:37 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456 View Post
Of course but it fits 1andrew1's agenda so he's happy to keep posting the doom and gloom.
Unlike you predicting more terror attacks which is not doom and gloom.

---------- Post added at 08:49 ---------- Previous post was at 08:38 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by RizzyKing View Post
I'm sick of seeing people talking about UK workers not being prepared to do certain jobs as while there is a tiny minority that won't work until they are forced too the majority do apply for any job trouble is the companys have a choice employ the UK worker and have to pay minimum wage or take on an immigrant that will work for £2-3 less an hour. Easy to work for less when your living 10+ to a house and skip out before having to pay utility bills and other mundane costs that normal people have to pay so quit talking trash about UK workers and condemning them all because of a few scroungers.

My brother (half brother if we're being exact) is in international business he runs a group of companys and both he and many of the businessmen he invites to his estate are very positive about brexit saying that more doors will open then close. They are already planning to take advantage of brexit as are many other business people there is a lot of positivity in certain quarters about brexit and it is perplexing that the FT can find none of it or report it. Despite the fact that journalists from the FT have had interviews with pro brexit business they just never make it into print but a negative brexit article hits print at bullet speed. The FT used to be a business persons point of information but it's reputation is suffering because of a couple of things brexit being one where it is definately running an agenda.
In what ways can they take advantage of Brexit?
Which business people has the FT interviewed but not published? Don't you think those business people would kick up a stink if the FT wasted their time and did not publish the interviews? Interviews with the very few pro-Brexit business people (JCB, Dyson, Tim Martin of Wetherspoons) have been published to death.
One issue with employment is a lot of jobs with ready vacancies are in London. Younger workers from around the world are prepared to travel there and take them whereas older unemployed people in the rest of the UK with families, kids at local schools and a good community are not. I can understand this and it's partly a structural failing of the London-centric economy with finance, Government and business HQ all in the same city.
1andrew1 is offline