View Single Post
Old 24-10-2016, 16:46   #2210
Hugh
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,099
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Re: Post-Brexit Thread

Perhaps they may do what has been suggested we do - find different markets without those tariffs for their goods and services...

Here is the actual article from Civitas.

http://www.civitas.org.uk/reports_ar...r-eu-uk-trade/
Quote:
This is a reflection of the current balance of trade between the EU and the UK. As a net importer of EU goods the UK government would potentially collect over twice as much in tariffs on EU goods than would be levied on UK goods going to the EU.

Of course, a high-level aggregate approach of this nature obscures the direct impact on the ground. It is unlikely to provide much comfort to a British exporter facing higher costs to learn that overall the UK is a net ‘winner’ or to be told that his overseas competitors are left in an even worse position. However, the £12.9 billion in additional revenues would provide the UK government with significantly more funds than our EU counterparts to invest in boosting the UK economy, or to implement on ‘mitigation’ measures to counteract the impact (within the bounds of WTO rules).

That said, these tariffs would be a cost that would be damaging to both UK and EU exporters and should put pressure on both sides in the negotiations to achieve a deal that is in the interest of their own economies.
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it
.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Hugh is offline