Quote:
Originally Posted by passingbat
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
Did you actually bother to view the video passingbat posted earlier?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Nothing says "Independent" like a Republican Chairman of the oversight committee briefing the Republican President that he may have been part of an incidental intelligence collection that was all done legally (incidental and legally being his words).
Shouldn't he wait until the investigation is complete before talking to the person who may have been involved in this?
As the top Democrat on the committee said
Even more ironically
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39358363
|
So did you actually watch the video I posted Hugh?
I do agree it does not seem the right way to go about things. But that video raises some grave concerns. Now they may turn out to be legitimate reasons for that surveillance; I am still reserving judgement. But the facts of this need to come to light. People who are serious about commenting on this, need to here what Nunes said. Likewise it is important to listen to Schiff's response.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JCq_wRtuxk&t=934s