Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Nothing says "Independent" like a Republican Chairman of the oversight committee briefing the Republican President that he may have been part of an incidental intelligence collection that was all done legally (incidental and legally being his words).
Shouldn't he wait until the investigation is complete before talking to the person who may have been involved in this?
|
Nothing legal about spying on folk without any reason for doing so and without Warrant. The Russian links are weak. Isn't it so disappointing for liberals and Democrats, that no evidence, not one shred, that shows Trump has close ties to Putin and the FBI have been investigating this since July 2016 and still found nothing?
These are just pathetic Democrats throwing out crap because they still cannot believe their horrid choice for a presidential candidate lost.
As for the video...He said he had been approached with reports ranging from November 2016 to through Jan 2017. Chatter that contained normal talk during Transition. He also said they need to work out what laws, if any have been violated, so it is not quite true to conclude that absolutely no laws were broken during this incidental snooping.