Quote:
Originally Posted by MUD_Wizard
That's a spurious argument as it's environment dependent. It might be the case it might not.
|
It's the case in 100% of environments.
You need to read the 50x+ times I've already explained why Smallnetbuilder's measurement methods are unrepresentative. That becomes pretty obvious when you see Cisco get higher throughput out of an AC433 client two football pitches away than Smallnetbuilder do out of a AC1200 client in the same room.
Quote:
|
The 433Mbps link rate doesn't come into it really, unless transferring data point to point, as the limiting factor here on 5Ghz is going to be the 100Mbps ethernet ports. So real world throughput average speeds will always be no more than 75-85Mbps, with peak at 95Mbps, regardless of any wifi link rates.
|
That's a spurious argument since you're now trying to weasel out of being wrong by pointing to factors that we were not even talking about in the first place.
Quote:
|
Like I said, doesn't matter because of ethernet. Btw, in the smallnetbuilder link I posted above the AC433/866/1300 clients connected to the AC1300 router were getting no more than 20-30% throughput on downlink. I was being generous.
|
That's a spurious argument as it's environment dependent. They're conducted under very specific conditions and not realistic representations of the capabilities of the device.
Maybe you should start reading things like this, rather than consumer reports mumbo jumbo:
https://web.archive.org/web/20151203...s/20141212.pdf
http://www.jwcn.eurasipjournals.com/...9-2013-226.pdf