Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart
That's the problem the authorities have. They need evidence for a prosecution, and more often that not in any abuse case, there will be two people present. The accused and the victim.
.......
but when the person being accused may actually end up in prison as a result of the accusations, they need proof.
|
This is the thing about these cases that bothers me.
You have the accused, and the (alledged) victim, and all you appear to have is the word of one against the other about events 10/20/30+ years ago , and yet they seem to be found guilty. How is that possible ? Where is the evidence/proof ?
From what Ive seen (which may not be the whole story of course) anyone can claim to be a victim of a random star/person, and that star/person end up in court.