Quote:
Originally Posted by Paddy1
Well then, if a dictator is torturing and murdering his population, and the majority of the UN hasn't got it's finger out and decided action should be taken, then should a nation take action on it's own and oust the dictator?
|
If it is in a position to do so and its the only way to stop him, yes.
If the UN is unable to protect the people of a nation from it's leaders then why shouldn't another nation take action to do so?
Sure, in the real world nations don't intervene for a number of reasons; no personal gain, too much risk, lack of support at home etc.
Put it like this, if TB somehow manouvered himself into absolute power, tortured and murdered Britains, would you rather another nation came in and ousted New Labour, or would you prefer TB remained in power while the UN took their time and perhaps decided to do nothing because of TB's influence and promises to other nations?