[danielf]

Originally Posted by TheNorm

Isn't that the topic under discussion?

By the way, here is a link to the full scientific paper, in case anyone wants to read what was actually written before it was churned into a headline by a "journalist":

http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/201...11-100411.full

I had a look at that, and I wouldn't call it a 'scientific paper'. The paper is absolute dross and full of self-serving circular definitions. It's just an opinion piece (and an extreme one at that), nothing more, nothing less. Anyone of us could write that as a letter to the editor of our favourite newspaper. This one's been published in the Medical equivalent of the Daily Star, and it should be treated as such.