Thread: SD Why are we still bothering with SD?
View Single Post
Old 07-11-2017, 12:35   #75
theone2k10
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: between Mars and Venus
Age: 44
Services: Plusnet 40mb unlimited fibre, roku, Verizon, netflix, nowtv, hbogo, hulu, SKY+HD box sets pack
Posts: 3,912
theone2k10 has reached the bronze age
theone2k10 has reached the bronze agetheone2k10 has reached the bronze agetheone2k10 has reached the bronze agetheone2k10 has reached the bronze agetheone2k10 has reached the bronze agetheone2k10 has reached the bronze agetheone2k10 has reached the bronze age
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY View Post
Isn't Sky Sports cheaper to watch on Now tv than on satellite or cable? And it's shown in 720p HD.
Not really no Skysports cost a average of £25p/m on sky and cable whereas on nowtv it's £33.99p/m

---------- Post added at 12:35 ---------- Previous post was at 12:34 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by vincerooney View Post
In short answer a lot of elderly people still only have SD TVs. Also I’m terrified of HD only channels since sky will lick their lips and add more HD charges
And vm won't?
At least both SKY and BT are honest about their HD charges and don't say "HD at no extra cost" and hide it in the cost of the package.
theone2k10 is offline   Reply With Quote