View Single Post
Old 06-11-2017, 13:44   #68
jj20x
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raider999 View Post
Need to get rid of some channels to free up bandwidth.

Start by getting rid of the myriad of +1 channels - never saw the point of them, if you want to watch 2 programmes at any one time record them, if you have missed something and realise it then use catch-up.
Until BARB figures show a significant decline in the +1 audience, the broadcasters will continue to operate them. Sure, the availability of multiple tuner PVRs and catch-up will reduce demand over time but not in the short term.

---------- Post added at 13:30 ---------- Previous post was at 13:22 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by ottoni View Post
I think you're right, at one time the plus one channels served a good purpose before the advent of PVR's. Surely the bandwidth would be better used towards launching hd channels. It still amazes me that so many channels still haven't got an hd counterpart. So many channels have absolutely terrible SD quality, makes it painful to watch.
If there was a shortage of bandwidth for launching new HD channels that would be a good point but there isn't a shortage at this point in time. There's a possibility that some channels will never operate in HD but a decision based on cost rather than bandwidth availability.

There probably isn't the bandwidth to launch a myriad of linear UHD channels with the current infrastructure but, again, no real demand for the bandwidth as broadcasters are baulking at the cost.

---------- Post added at 13:44 ---------- Previous post was at 13:30 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
Modern technologies don't, IMO, display colour as well as CRT. Plasma comes close, but it's not quite right.
More modern technologies such as OLED and HDR should change that.
  Reply With Quote