View Single Post
Old 10-03-2008, 15:47   #7
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,536
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: Why buy expensive cables...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Peter View Post
Monster cables aren't really very expensive in hi-fi snobbery terms The test does prove a valid point though: unless you're going to spend over £500 on a pair of speaker cables there probably won't be any tangible difference in the sound quality. Even then you could argue that the magnitude of audible difference will have you asking the more money than sense question.

Twin & Earth does indeed do a perfectly good job
Unless you are using long cables (> 20 metres), would spending £500 *really* make an audible difference? I know that at work, when we refitted the lecture theatres this summer, we spent a lot of money (don't know how much) on Cable, but then the average cable run was nearly 30 metres.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote