View Single Post
Old 05-05-2012, 19:30   #11
Fawkes
Inactive
 
Fawkes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester
Age: 47
Services: VM: 120M Broadband, TV + Landline
Posts: 471
Fawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond reputeFawkes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Pornography online: David Cameron to consider 'opt in' plan

I seem to remember when this idea was first mooted the plan was that new subscribers would be given the choice, porn or no porn and all existing subs who wanted porn filtering had to call and request it. Didn't have a major problem with that aside from the cost to the ISP (read cost to subscribers).
Now it looks like they are leaning towards off for all and call if you want it back. This activated my paranoia gland, why block legal content across the board like that, porn today, what tomorrow?
__________________
'It's only when you look at an ant through a magnifying glass on a sunny day that you realise how often they burst into flames.' -Harry Hill
Fawkes is offline   Reply With Quote