View Single Post
Old 14-03-2012, 17:11   #10
mertle
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,134
mertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quadsmertle has a fine set of Quads
Re: Animal activists success stopping animal imports for research harming research

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Fry View Post
Then they will have to not take any medication thoughout their lives
indeed

wikki has nice link about all pro's to please please this not for the squeamish goes in great length.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_testing

Apparantly there is alternatives dont see how viable some are dont fancy being the test subject of PET.

Any volunteers anybody to be lab rat pays well

Quote:
Alternatives to animal testing

Main article: Alternatives to animal testing
Scientists and governments state that animal testing should cause as little suffering to animals as possible, and that animal tests should only be performed where necessary. The "three Rs"[100] are guiding principles for the use of animals in research in most countries:
  1. Replacement refers to the preferred use of non-animal methods over animal methods whenever it is possible to achieve the same scientific aim.
  2. Reduction refers to methods that enable researchers to obtain comparable levels of information from fewer animals, or to obtain more information from the same number of animals.
  3. Refinement refers to methods that alleviate or minimize potential pain, suffering or distress, and enhance animal welfare for the animals still used.[199]
Alternative methods include positron emission tomography (PET), which allows scanning of the human brain in vivo,[200] and comparative epidemiological studies of disease risk factors among human populations.[201] Several invertebrate systems are considered acceptable alternatives to animals in very early stage discovery screens.[202] Because of similarities between the innate immune system of insects and mammals, insects can replace mammals in certain types of studies. Drosophila melanogaster and the Galleria mellonella (waxworm) have been particularly important for analysis of virulence traits of mammalian pathogens.[203][204] Waxworms and other insects have also proven valuable for the identification of pharmaceutical compounds with favorable bioavailability.[205] The decision to adopt such models generally involves accepting a lower degree of biological similarity with mammals for significant gains in experimental throughput.
Although such principles have been welcomed as a step forwards by some animal welfare groups,[206] they have also been criticized as both outdated by current research,[207] and of little practical effect in improving animal welfare.[208]
mertle is offline   Reply With Quote