View Single Post
Old 12-03-2012, 14:59   #106
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Speed test sites and why you shouldnt take them for granted

I don't see anything wrong with the routing from VM to Thinkbroadband:
root@d:~# traceroute pingbox1.thinkbroadband.com
traceroute to pingbox1.thinkbroadband.com (80.249.99.164), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 cpc5-sgyl34-2-0-gw.sgyl.cable.virginmedia.com (92.235.188.1) 5.163 ms 7.097 ms 8.761 ms
2 sgyl-core-1a-ge133.network.virginmedia.net (81.97.48.37) 5.964 ms 41.528 ms 6.700 ms
3 sgyl-core-2a-ae2-0.network.virginmedia.net (195.182.178.90) 7.734 ms 7.896 ms 12.581 ms
4 manc-bb-1c-ae6-0.network.virginmedia.net (81.97.48.77) 12.255 ms 13.735 ms 13.451 ms
5 manc-bb-1a-ae11-0.network.virginmedia.net (213.105.159.85) 12.103 ms 10.335 ms 19.811 ms
6 brnt-bb-1b-ae1-0.network.virginmedia.net (212.43.163.86) 27.316 ms 89.367 ms 29.024 ms
7 brnt-tmr-1-ae5-0.network.virginmedia.net (213.105.159.50) 19.143 ms 23.646 ms 20.348 ms
8 telc-ic-1-as0-0.network.virginmedia.net (62.253.185.74) 19.456 ms 18.329 ms 19.809 ms
9 linx-gw1.thdo.ncuk.net (195.66.226.240) 22.151 ms 20.265 ms 25.448 ms
10 gi0-24-10-star1.core-rs2.thdo.ncuk.net (80.249.97.9) 44.475 ms 23.248 ms 21.828 ms
11 pingbox1.thinkbroadband.com (80.249.99.164) 21.326 ms 20.095 ms 17.678 ms

Last I measured, jitter (an indirect measure of congestion) from VM to TBB's network was 30-40% lower than on other routes, e.g. to BBC or Multiplay. Now my connection's suddenly gotten a lot better I'll do some more measurements but I doubt the results will be much different.

---------- Post added at 14:59 ---------- Previous post was at 14:16 ----------

Yup. Ignoring the huge amount of base jitter on my line, the route from my VM connection to Thinkbroadband's network still performs better than 3 other test locations:

Statistics for pingbox1.thinkbroadband.com:
Packets: sent=10000, rcvd=10000, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 999.925545 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 16.510 / 21.404 / 157.329 / 6.470
Bandwidth in kb/sec: sent=0.600, rcvd=0.600

Statistics for www.multiplay.co.uk:
Packets: sent=10000, rcvd=10000, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 999.919494 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 17.300 / 22.524 / 141.443 / 7.286
Bandwidth in kb/sec: sent=0.600, rcvd=0.600

Statistics for www.bbc.co.uk:
Packets: sent=10000, rcvd=9996, error=0, lost=4 (0.0% loss) in 999.921639 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 17.740 / 23.225 / 153.303 / 7.477
Bandwidth in kb/sec: sent=0.600, rcvd=0.599

Statistics for harnoncourt.inf.ed.ac.uk:
Packets: sent=10000, rcvd=10000, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 999.930225 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 28.086 / 33.845 / 158.170 / 7.048
Bandwidth in kb/sec: sent=0.600, rcvd=0.600
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote