View Single Post
Old 07-11-2005, 13:14   #12
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Ive got rid of my NTL to get Sky+ half price for a year - Is it worth it for a year?

It is physically impossible to reduce sat latency, you have to request the information and then it has to be sent. Both travel as radio waves at the speed of sound.

Quote:
Originally Posted by howstuffworks
Data, television, image and some telephone transmissions are routinely received and rebroadcast by communications satellites. Typical satellite telephone links have 550 to 650 milliseconds of round-trip delay that contribute to consumer dissatisfaction with this type of long-distance carrier. It takes the voice communications that long to travel all the way up to the satellite and back to Earth.
http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/satellite7.htm
That latency + the latency of the ground based network would mean that you would be heading up towards 3/4 sec each way, for the request and the return to be by sat, that would be a 1.5s latency!
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote