View Single Post
Old 23-05-2006, 17:50   #20
TheBlueRaja
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Baw deep in a munter
Age: 48
Services: Initiations, rep rigging and orgies!
Posts: 5,750
TheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny star
TheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny starTheBlueRaja has a nice shiny star
Re: SkyHD dates getting bumped already

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
I do hear you m8, & I do kinda agree with what you are saying, but it's your opinion that it's overpriced etc-one man's salt etc.

Any product is only 'worth' what someone is willing to pay, & if people are willing to pay £300 for Sky's HD Service, then so be it....
I did say IMO (In my Opinion) in all fairness and yup i agree with your point but IMO they are daft and have too much money.

I have seen a few HD demo's when i bought my HD telly recently (from John Lewis) most are just HD content played from a PC. However i dont recall seeing any National Geo or Discovery HD stuff on them, so it might have been an HD feed.

In fact IIRC in John Lewis all they had was over the air freeview running in the Glasgow store, Currys at least had the PC hooked up.

Curry's also had exactly the same feed split to three different HD tellies (a Pioneer, Panasonic and a Samsung) which was great for comparing.

The Panasonic was best incidentally, again IMO.

Im getting to feel like i need a standard disclaimer in my sig.
TheBlueRaja is offline   Reply With Quote