Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
It is to make a wider point and America has benefitted from nato, it neatly fitted in with their foreign policy, meant they were in charge rather than a supporting ally to a gulp European army and of course when they were attacked it meant nato supported them with or without that lapdog Blair. Some countries probably should spend more but let's not be daft enough to think it's only about money
|
NATO is a mutually beneficial alliance. I don't think America is using it as a charity but at the same time they're by the far the biggest contributor to an alliance predominately designed to secure Europe, especially from Russian aggression.