View Single Post
Old 27-06-2018, 12:43   #6
Mr_love_monkey
Inactive
 
Mr_love_monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London way
Age: 48
Services: Sarcasm
Posts: 8,376
Mr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny stars
Mr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny starsMr_love_monkey has a pair of shiny stars
Re: The over-40s should pay a 'social care premium'

I don't have an issue with this, as such... but a) I'd want to be sure they weren't suddenly going to move the goal posts again - "yes, you've paid all this extra tax, but we still don't have enough, so because you have some money saved, you need to pay for it all...." and b) I noticed this "They also suggested the money raised could be used to support the care system for younger adults with disabilities, which forms part of the wider social care system." - if that's the case then everyone should pay it - if it affects everyone, then everyone should pay
Mr_love_monkey is offline   Reply With Quote