Thread: 350M Vivid 350?
View Single Post
Old 25-08-2017, 15:53   #105
kalleh
cf.addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 108
kalleh is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Vivid 350?

http://beta.speedtest.net/result/6568434617


Decided to have VOOM 350 installed with the Hitron as a 2nd line to run along the TTB 80/20.

Didn't go with static IP as didn't fancy the whole GRE Tunnel idea isn't really required anyway.

Some comparisons : Voom 350

Pinging multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.26] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.26: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.236.96.26: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=54
Reply from 85.236.96.26: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=53
Reply from 85.236.96.26: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 42ms, Average = 32ms



TTB 80/20


Pinging multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.26] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.26: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=56
Reply from 85.236.96.26: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=56
Reply from 85.236.96.26: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=56
Reply from 85.236.96.26: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 15ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 15ms



So where the VM will serve me well for large downloads. It wouldn't be wise to get rid of the TTB line for latency intensive applications or gaming as I expected.
kalleh is offline   Reply With Quote