View Single Post
Old 07-09-2014, 00:26   #293
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 45
Posts: 13,996
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels

Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus View Post
nope, the sad thing is that VM know they can do whatever they want because there is FA the customers can do about it. It would be great if everyone cancelled there VM services and moved over to BT, it might make them think twice and ask themselves what they were doing wrong.
Right. Clearly people will dump VM for offering 120Mb instead of 152Mb and go en masse to BT to get at most 76Mb.

If people are so upset by the difference between 120Mb and 152Mb not likely to drop to 76. Ignoring that if people are so upset they're a bit weird.

---------- Post added at 00:26 ---------- Previous post was at 00:25 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gstevie View Post
Its a sad state of affairs when paying customers just need to settle for what ever crazy broken promises are half delivered by a company. There is very little choice in some areas, like mine, if you want to get speeds anything like what VM offer. Its obviously not something that can be undone at the end of the day, we do however, as customers have the right to express out disappointment when we never get what is promised when its initially offered.
When were you promised an upgrade by said date?
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote