View Single Post
Old 07-03-2012, 00:20   #22
Tim Deegan
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Services: 3 phone lines, 100mb broadband, and TV x2 (including one Tivo)
Posts: 2,128
Tim Deegan has reached the bronze age
Tim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze ageTim Deegan has reached the bronze age
Re: Pensions - no wonder there are strikes

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
Depends on the scheme. NFPS is for people who stated from April 2006.
The retirement age is to be based around 60, but could be from 55(reduced pension).
So the retirement age of 60 was set in 2006. Who was in government then?
What does it matter who was in government? They have been talking about this for many years.

The NFPS was never agreed to.

Quote:
Overview of the offer
Following extended constructive discussions with the firefighter unions, the Department for Communities and Local Government has published a Heads of Agreement on the core parameters for reforms to the firefighters’ pension scheme.
This wasn't actually a heads of agreement, because nothing was ever agreed. So even the title was wrong

---------- Post added at 00:20 ---------- Previous post was at 00:19 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobbydaler View Post
The FBU are totally impartial, aren't they...
I didn't say for a second that they are. However they aren't going to come up with information that is simply wrong. They are mounting legal challenges against the government, and they would be laughed out of court if they did.

Unlike propoganda that the government puts out to discredit anyone who is in dispute with them, the FBU don't want to take industrial action, it is a last resort. The web site is there to give members the FACTS.
Tim Deegan is offline   Reply With Quote