View Single Post
Old 01-11-2014, 12:00   #6
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 45
Posts: 13,996
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: The people vs PFI.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Angry View Post
Still, PFI was after all a Tory idea so we should expect nothing less.
Though no-one compelled Labour to spend so heavily during a boom that they were increasing our debt to GDP ratio, alongside these off-book liabilities that they were accumulating and the tax increases they were enacting.

States are supposed to deleverage during growth periods so that the stabilisers can kick in during recessionary parts of the cycle without causing major issues.

It was, without a doubt, a means to conceal debt and remains as such. It will likely only get worse with the completely misplaced obsession over our debt and deficit.

It would be fabulous if people were shown our current unfunded liabilities. That would put the alleged debt into some focus.

As it is we're, including what PFI has stashed away, in a level of debt not seen since the early 60s and our recovery from the Second World War, thanks to a wonderful series of inept decisions by economic illiterates over the past couple of decades.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote