SPECULATION, SPECULATION.........AND A BIT MORE SPECULATION
We don't, nobody doesn't know anything yet.
" it appears". " it might", "it looks like" , ....................
This will drag on for months, if not years, until the investigation is complete.
But until the investigations are complete it's all opinion, nothing more.
---------- Post added at 22:01 ---------- Previous post was at 21:51 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Again, needlessly added whilst residents were complaining about actual issues with the building.
|
Needlessly? In your expert opinion. It was part of refurb to improve the quality of the accommodation and the aesthetic of o very drab 60's/70's tower block.
When you decorate your house/ flat, is it needlessly?
When I spend money to improve the aesthetic of my house it is isn't money spent needlessly.
Quote:
|
No it shouldn't. There seems to be an acceptance that the cladding is what caused it to spread so fast.
|
Sorry no.
The fire spread internally just as quick. There was a complete failure to compartmentalise the fire.
Each flat, stairwell, dry riser, should be a fire compartment designed to contain the fire for a period of time.
Even if the fire burned away on the outside, it should not of ingressed internally and escape should have been possible.
This fire clearly propagated internally as quick as externally.
What we don't need, but unfortunately will get, is a load of armchair experts.