Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
It's used up and down the country, not just in this instance. If it's that bad, why isn't it completely banned or simply not made in the first place.
|
Well yes, Why wasn't it? One of many questions.
Quote:
|
The cheapest option was to have no cladding at all. It wasn't replacing anything, it was an additional feature.
|
Again, needlessly added whilst residents were complaining about actual issues with the building.
Quote:
|
The fire still got outside from inside a flat and then back into the building. Should that have happened that quickly?
|
No it shouldn't. There seems to be an acceptance that the cladding is what caused it to spread so fast.