View Single Post
Old 12-02-2013, 18:50   #3381
Qtx
CF's Worst Nightmare
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Probably outside the M25
Services: Sky Fibre Unlimited 40/10
Posts: 3,473
Qtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appeal
Qtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appeal
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kymmy View Post
Just about all TBB's on a dual VM upstream now show the same minimum latency variation and have done since day one of the 2nd upstream channel being added.
Not something I had noticed. Good to know though.

So there can be a few ms difference between ping results depending on which of the 2 upstreams the ping reply returns on?

If this is the case, is it wrong to assume both upstreams should give the same results?

They look so different to my own connection that any variation looks 'off':

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]
Qtx is offline   Reply With Quote