View Single Post
Old 02-08-2021, 12:12   #13
spiderplant
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,901
spiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny stars
spiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny starsspiderplant has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Halogen bulb ban

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter View Post
Is it more environmentally friendly/cheaper to use up inefficient bulbs and use more electricity than it is to:throw away working bulbs and buy the modern efficient ones to save electricity/money?
"More environmentally friendly" isn't easy to assess, but you could certainly work out whether it would be cheaper for you.

For example:
Replace a 100W incandescent with a 15W LED bulb that costs £1.45. You are saving 0.085kWh for every hour that it's turned on. If you pay 20p per kWh for your electricity, the bulb will pay for itself after 85 hours use. So definitely worthwhile for a bulb you use several hours a day; not so for a rarely-used one.
spiderplant is offline   Reply With Quote