Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456
Once payments no longer need to be made parliament can decide where any money is spent and what for..
|
Exactly; Taking back control.
---------- Post added at 23:10 ---------- Previous post was at 23:05 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
The first condition looks impossible to achieve. I suspect it's there to highlight an undeliverable promise made by David Davis.
Labour seems to have belatedly have woken up to Brexit and probably views it as a great way to heap pressure on the Government when it's stretched.
Labour set to outline six conditions for support of Brexit Bill in House of Commons- Does it deliver the "exact same benefits" as the UK currently has as a member of the single market and customs union?
- Does it ensure a strong and collaborative future relationship with the EU?
- Does it ensure the fair management of migration "in the interests of the economy and communities"?
- Does it defend rights and protections and "prevent a race to the bottom"?
- Does it protect national security and the UK's capacity to tackle cross-border crime?
- Does it deliver for all regions and nations of the UK?
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/polit...-a3499601.html
|
Why is anyone surprised at those demands? Labour leadership wants us to stay in the EU.