View Single Post
Old 14-08-2016, 23:14   #16
Gary L
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,325
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Gary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny starGary L has a nice shiny star
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
We should work on the assumption that if you wouldn't write it in a letter to someone or say it to their face then neither is it acceptable online.
As silly as it may sound.

you might not know their address to send them a letter or to travel to, to say it to their face.
so is it the acceptable online?

if not then why not. and then is it all down to whether the person is offended?

is it down to alarm and distress?

what alarms me may not alarm the judger.
what distreeses the judger may not distress the onlooker.

it's a bit like one may not not like Marmite. but another one does.
which one's right?

Last edited by Gary L; 14-08-2016 at 23:17.
Gary L is offline   Reply With Quote