View Single Post
Old 25-08-2017, 12:20   #8
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,228
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: Fake rape victim jailed

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees View Post
On a more serious note, perhaps this demonstrates more evidence of why anonymity for both accused and accuser is required prior to the outcome of a trial.
I've always thought a good solution would be default anonymity for the accused unless a judge rules it in the public interest to release their name for cases such as Rolf Harris or Saville where someone is largely prosecuted in the testimony of many people. I.E There is a suggestion someone has abused a position of authority to groom/rape people.

Last edited by Damien; 25-08-2017 at 12:39.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote