View Single Post
Old 06-05-2022, 20:41   #1530
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 7,867
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: Police to get tough on internet trolls.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 View Post
Again, you fail to address the questions with tangential questions and links.

1. No evidence of books being cancelled. Hachette has not cancelled any of Rowling's books. Some staff may not like them but they're still published. We need to look at what's actually happening as oppose to imagining some kind of scifi world where these things might happen..

2. Your statement "As opposed to the current system of "I don't like it, so you're not allowed to say it, no matter how true it is."
Again, no evidence that this is the current system. If there's a market and funding for content we'll hear it, from Nigel Farage to James O'Brien.

---------- Post added at 19:11 ---------- Previous post was at 19:06 ----------

J K Rowling's book was not cancelled by Hachette.
So JK Rowling hasn't been boycotted in several ways? So Hachette have never cancelled a book because the staff complained?
What is more sinister is people having to self-censor. That is by its very nature hidden and is impossible to prove.
Quote:
As Jordanian-American author Natasha Tynes discovered, this arrangement can extend to criticising someone online for eating on a train. Tynes’s remarks about a Washington Metro employees’ behaviour may have been judgemental, interfering even, but swathes of social media users went further and said Tynes’ remarks were racist because the staff member she was criticising was black. Her book deal was duly canned.
nomadking is offline   Reply With Quote