Cable Forum - View Single Post - Car crashes in to Pedestrians outside Houses of Parliament

Chloé Palmas · 15-08-2018, 21:25

Perhaps but then again when May was Home sec she did all the parts that involved limiting the freedom(s) of law abiding citizens. Parts of the UK are a police state (everything from Ripa laws (PA variations) used to look through folks garbage to Prism being even more intrusive than the NSA + doing their bidding / to the unfettered powers that social services have or speed cameras everywhere + CCTV all round the capital) yet at the same time she somehow has done zilch on the security aspect.

David Davis is the one civil libertarian left in the realms of Tory party (mainstream) politics and he resigned over some of this - his more traditional view of civil liberties falls into a BF style of security vs liberty.

May though on the other hand, is the only woman on the planet to take away everybody's civil liberties and offer them zero reciprocal security benefits - she forgot the part about keeping people safe.

Also, a lot of folks had said that the nation was safe when she was HS but that was mainly due to the fact that other wings of the government (and parts above her, like PM / MoD etc) were all run by people who were competent enough to keep the security apparatus in check. (Hammond / Fox etc). When she took over there was no check on her (like a check and balance) because she was the one who was in charge and when the net is loose at the top, it is not like a sieve where everything can get through the bottom, it is like an open invitation for anything to get in, and stay in. (Like terrorists / sleeper cells etc). The woman has no clue what she is doing. Thankfully it is not too bad for us. Because it is so confusing, neither does the enemy.

15-08-2018, 21:25	#12
Chloé Palmas Inactive Join Date: May 2018 Location: Surrey Services: Sky HD (2 TB / 1.5 TB MultiRoom) Sky Fiber Max Posts: 510	Re: Car crashes in to Pedestrians outside Houses of Parliament Perhaps but then again when May was Home sec she did all the parts that involved limiting the freedom(s) of law abiding citizens. Parts of the UK are a police state (everything from Ripa laws (PA variations) used to look through folks garbage to Prism being even more intrusive than the NSA + doing their bidding / to the unfettered powers that social services have or speed cameras everywhere + CCTV all round the capital) yet at the same time she somehow has done zilch on the security aspect. David Davis is the one civil libertarian left in the realms of Tory party (mainstream) politics and he resigned over some of this - his more traditional view of civil liberties falls into a BF style of security vs liberty. May though on the other hand, is the only woman on the planet to take away everybody's civil liberties and offer them zero reciprocal security benefits - she forgot the part about keeping people safe. Also, a lot of folks had said that the nation was safe when she was HS but that was mainly due to the fact that other wings of the government (and parts above her, like PM / MoD etc) were all run by people who were competent enough to keep the security apparatus in check. (Hammond / Fox etc). When she took over there was no check on her (like a check and balance) because she was the one who was in charge and when the net is loose at the top, it is not like a sieve where everything can get through the bottom, it is like an open invitation for anything to get in, and stay in. (Like terrorists / sleeper cells etc). The woman has no clue what she is doing. Thankfully it is not too bad for us. Because it is so confusing, neither does the enemy.