Quote:
Originally Posted by General Maximus
I dont know but I thought I would blame you for it 
Seriously though, it was either you, Masque or Nopanic, I can't remember which one though. It was probably Masque because I can remember the speach about the shub and how that is all VM are interested in and the vmgn300 is end of line bla bla bla and they arent interested in supporting it and if anything goes wrong it will be replaced with the shub etc etc.
I am honestly well chuffed that they have gone to the effort of having new firmware written though to fix whatever is wrong with the upstream. It shows they are happy with us keeping the vmng300 for a while because they could easly have said screw you, you need a shub to get it to work if previous comments made in the past were anything to go by. |
hmm.
it could also be to bump up the vmng300's US buffering after a few of us told VM it was lower than the superhub's. I hope not as then jitter will increase.
Funny news tho after masque said the vmng300 was dead and buried.